TACN ranks 5th and SSXU 46th of 55 funds in the International Active Equity Category.
SSXU vs TACN
TACN −1.19pt a year
1.19%0.00%
SSXU 2.1×the volume
5.39K2.59K
SSXU vs TACN Performance
−0.8%+10.5%
- SSXU 1.19%
- TACN 0.00%, better
- SSXU $44M
- TACN $24M
- SSXU +1.7%
- TACN
- SSXU 2.68%
- TACN
- SSXU 18
- TACN 508
- SSXU 5.39K sh, better
- TACN 2.59K sh
- SSXU $34.71
- TACN $28.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SSXU | TACN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F2 | A100Higher |
| Mission | B61 | |
| Risk | C52 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | D35 | A82Higher |
| Durability | C53Higher | D30 |
Rank among International Active Equity funds
Same Category. SSXU and TACN are both graded against the same 55 International Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SSXUD
TACNA
In short
SSXU An international stock fund with a brake pedal: it owns other managers' overseas ETFs and, when its models read reward-to-risk as poor, can shift up to half the portfolio into cash or Treasuries. The machinery costs 1.19% a year.
TACN T. Rowe Price's index-aware take on developed international stocks: it shadows the MSCI EAFE benchmark while nudging weights, and the fee is waived to 0.00% through January 30, 2027 (0.20% gross).
Stated mandate
SSXU The Fund seeks total return through income and capital appreciation. It actively invests mainly in unaffiliated international equity ETFs and adjusts geographic exposures relative to the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index.
TACN The fund's goal is to achieve long-term capital growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SSXU vs TACN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SSXU vs TACN Cost
Overpaying SSXU vs TACN
$21,697
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SSXU 1.19%
$21,697
TACN 0.00%
$0
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SSXU | TACN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,081 | $0 | $2,081 |
| 20 | $7,756 | $0 | $7,756 |
| 30 | $21,697 | $0 | $21,697 |
- 1.19%SSXU
- 0.00%TACN, cheaper
- Middle half of International Active Equity funds
- Median 0.55%
TACN cheapest of 55 funds
SSXU 54th cheapest of 55 funds
SSXU vs TACN Dividends
- SSXU 2.68%
- TACN
- SSXU $0.91
- TACN None
- SSXU $0.91
- TACN
- SSXU Dec 29, 2025
- TACN
- SSXU Dec 30, 2025
- TACN
- SSXU Annual
- TACN
Distribution history
SSXU vs TACN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SSXU 10.5%TACN
- Return per unit of risk
- SSXU 0.76TACN
- Worst fall
- SSXU −13.9%TACN
- Market sensitivity
- SSXU 0.69TACN 0.65
SSXU and TACN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.19% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.19% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.19% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
