TBF ranks 3rd and TMV 6th of 7 funds in the Inverse Treasury Category.
TBF vs TMV
TBF −0.02pt a year
0.95%0.97%
TMV 5.6×the volume
213K1.19M
TBF +3.6pt
+2.7%−0.9%
TBF vs TMV Performance
+85.1%+260.5%
- TBF 0.95%, better
- TMV 0.97%
- TBF $114M
- TMV $186M
- TBF +9.9%
- TMV +25.5%, better
- TBF 2.32%, better
- TMV 2.27%
- TBF 3
- TMV 6
- TBF 213K sh
- TMV 1.19M sh, better
- TBF $25.38
- TMV $42.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TBF | TMV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B56Higher | F24 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | B55Higher | C41 |
| Durability | B58Higher | C54 |
Rank among Inverse Treasury funds
Same Category. TBF and TMV are both graded against the same 7 Inverse Treasury funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TBFB
TMVD
In short
TBF The plain one in a geared lineup: TBF aims for -1x the daily move of the S&P ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, with no 2x or 3x amplification. Trading since 2009 at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
TMV TMV aims for 300% of the inverse daily move of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, then resets the clock every day. Running since 2009 and priced under the typical bear-Treasury fund, it is built around a one-day objective.
Stated mandate
TBF The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to -1x the daily performance of the S&P ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index.
TMV The fund seeks, before fees and expenses, daily results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. This objective applies to a single day rather than longer holding periods.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TBF vs TMV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TBF vs TMV Cost
Overpaying TMV vs TBF
$329
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TBF 0.95%
$17,869
TMV 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TBF | TMV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,712 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,443 | $121 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $18,198 | $329 |
- 0.95%TBF, cheaper
- 0.97%TMV
- Middle half of Inverse Treasury funds
- Median 0.95%
TBF 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
TMV 6th cheapest of 7 funds
TBF vs TMV Dividends
- TBF 2.32%, better
- TMV 2.27%
- TBF $0.59
- TMV $0.96
- TBF $0.13
- TMV $0.23
- TBF Sep 23, 2026
- TMV Sep 22, 2026
- TBF Sep 29, 2026
- TMV Sep 29, 2026
- TBF Quarterly
- TMV Quarterly
Distribution history
TBF vs TMV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- TBF
- TMV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TBF 13.4%, betterTMV 40.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- TBF −0.11TMV 0.02, better
- Worst fall
- TBF −17.8%, betterTMV −48.5%
- Market sensitivity
- TBF −2.41TMV −6.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.