PST ranks 4th and TMV 6th of 7 funds in the Inverse Treasury Category.
PST vs TMV
PST −0.02pt a year
0.95%0.97%
TMV 184.6×the volume
6.43K1.19M
PST +3.5pt
+2.6%−0.9%
PST vs TMV Performance
+69.0%+260.5%
- PST 0.95%, better
- TMV 0.97%
- PST $11M
- TMV $186M
- PST +11.6%
- TMV +25.5%, better
- PST 2.50%, better
- TMV 2.27%
- PST 2
- TMV 6
- PST 6.43K sh
- TMV 1.19M sh, better
- PST $23.89
- TMV $42.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PST | TMV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B56Higher | F24 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B64Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | D33 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | B55Higher | C41 |
| Durability | C41 | C54Higher |
Rank among Inverse Treasury funds
Same Category. PST and TMV are both graded against the same 7 Inverse Treasury funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSTC
TMVD
In short
PST Most inverse Treasury ETFs aim at the 20+ year long bond. PST aims at the belly: two times the inverse of the daily move in the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, reset each day, trading since 2008.
TMV TMV aims for 300% of the inverse daily move of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, then resets the clock every day. Running since 2009 and priced under the typical bear-Treasury fund, it is built around a one-day objective.
Stated mandate
PST The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to approximately two times the inverse of the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. It does not seek this -2x target for periods other than a day.
TMV The fund seeks, before fees and expenses, daily results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. This objective applies to a single day rather than longer holding periods.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PST vs TMV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PST vs TMV Cost
Overpaying TMV vs PST
$329
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PST 0.95%
$17,869
TMV 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PST | TMV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,712 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,443 | $121 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $18,198 | $329 |
- 0.95%PST, cheaper
- 0.97%TMV
- Middle half of Inverse Treasury funds
- Median 0.95%
PST 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
TMV 6th cheapest of 7 funds
PST vs TMV Dividends
- PST 2.50%, better
- TMV 2.27%
- PST $0.60
- TMV $0.96
- PST $0.15
- TMV $0.23
- PST Sep 23, 2026
- TMV Sep 22, 2026
- PST Sep 29, 2026
- TMV Sep 29, 2026
- PST Quarterly
- TMV Quarterly
Distribution history
PST vs TMV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PST
- TMV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PST 13.3%, betterTMV 40.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- PST −0.20TMV 0.02, better
- Worst fall
- PST −16.2%, betterTMV −48.5%
- Market sensitivity
- PST −2.34TMV −6.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.