Skip to content

TRUT vs UTES

VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

TRUTANasdaq

Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF

UTESBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

TRUT −0.35pt a year

TRUT0.14%UTES0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

TRUT 1.2×the volume

TRUT182KUTES158K

TRUT vs UTES Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+12.7%TRUT−6.8%UTES

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. TRUT +12.7%. UTES −6.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
TRUT 0.14%, better
UTES 0.49%
Fund size
TRUT $238M
UTES $1.17B
1Y total return
TRUT +12.7%, better
UTES −6.8%
Yield (12M)
TRUT 0.35%
UTES 1.60%, better
Holdings
TRUT 77
UTES 19
Avg volume (30D)
TRUT 182K sh, better
UTES 158K sh
NAV per share
TRUT $31.15
UTES $76.69
52W range

ETF.net Grade

TRUT: Cost 93, Risk 23, Mission not scored, Tradability 96, Holdings 31, Durability 61. UTES: Cost 79, Risk 29, Mission not scored, Tradability 90, Holdings 39, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for TRUT, UTES, with each pillar’s weight
PillarTRUTUTES
Cost30% weightA93HigherA79
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF23D29Higher
Tradability15% weightA96HigherA90
Holdings10% weightD31D39Higher
Durability5% weightB61A85Higher

Rank among US Active Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. TRUT and UTES are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TRUT ranks 4th and UTES 5th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2BTMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4ATRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 5BUTESVirtus Reaves Utilities ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 6BTRUCVanEck Communication Services TruSector ETFScore 64

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

TRUTAVanEck Technology TruSector ETF

UTESBVirtus Reaves Utilities ETF

In short

TRUT Diversification rules force most tech ETFs to trim their biggest names. TRUT's answer: own the giants directly up to the legal line, then top up with sector ETFs so the portfolio mirrors the sector's real shape.

UTES Utilities, but stock-picked. UTES has run an active, value-driven, bottom-up portfolio of electricity, gas and water companies since 2015, at a fee below what the typical active US equity ETF charges.

Stated mandate

TRUT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment in securities of information technology-related companies or instruments providing exposure to them.

UTES The Fund seeks total return from capital appreciation and income.

Why people hold it

  • TRUT The mechanism is the point. Fund rules cap one stock at 25% and stocks above 5% at 50% combined; TRUT fills the gap with targeted sector ETFs instead of overweighting smaller names.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • 0.14% a year for an actively managed fund, against a median near 0.65% across active US equity peers. Cheap enough to sit alongside index products.
  • One of the two originals in VanEck's TruSector line, launched in 2025. The approach has since been extended across all 11 GICS sectors.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • About 80 positions, quarterly distributions, and steady day-to-day trading. On cost and tradability it lands in the upper tier of its active US equity cohort.
  • UTES Real stock picking in a quiet sector: a value-based, bottom-up process hunting utility names with room for income growth and capital appreciation.
  • The 0.49% fee undercuts the 0.65% median for active US equity ETFs in its peer group, so the manager isn't digging out of a cost hole.
  • Live since 2015 and now a billion-dollar-plus fund that trades easily, it sits in the upper half of its active US equity peer group.
  • Pays on a quarterly schedule, matching a mandate that chases total return from both capital appreciation and income.

Worth knowing

  • TRUT Part of the exposure arrives through other ETFs rather than shares the fund holds outright. That is the workaround that makes uncapped weights possible, and it adds a layer.vaneck.com
  • Uncapped means concentrated. Leaning fully into tech's largest companies ties results to a handful of mega-caps more tightly than a capped sector fund would.vaneck.com
  • Launched August 2025, so there is only a short record of how closely the hybrid build actually shadows an uncapped tech benchmark.
  • UTES At least 80% of assets sit in companies tied to generating or distributing electricity, gas or water. This is one sector, not the whole market.
  • Cheap for active, pricey next to the broad index-style leaders in its cohort such as DFAU (0.12%) and AVLC (0.15%).
  • No declared index behind it. The portfolio reflects the manager's judgment, so there's no benchmark to grade tracking against.

Full TRUT profile⁠

Full UTES profile⁠

TRUT vs UTES Holdings

How TRUT and UTES differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of TRUT and 0.0% of UTES.

Level by level

  • Asset classEquity, Alternatives0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile99.6%

Sector

No Sector split for TRUT.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in TRUT and UTES, widest gap first
CountryMore in TRUTMore in UTES
United StatesUTES +0.4 points
ChinaTRUT +0.3 points
MexicoTRUT +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • TRUT86.5%
  • UTES70.5%

Securities held

  • TRUT76
  • UTES18

Asset class

TRUT
Equity
UTES
Alternatives

Holdings

  • Only in TRUT76
  • In both0
  • Only in UTES18

Only in TRUT

76 securities, 100% of TRUT by weight

  • Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund30.70%
  • Nvidia Corp15.65%
  • Apple Inc15.40%

Only in UTES

18 securities, 99.6% of UTES by weight

  • Constellation Energy Corp11.41%
  • Talen Energy Corp11.39%
  • Vistra Corp9.63%

Weight gaps

TRUT and UTES share no securities.

All 75 TRUT holdings⁠All 198 UTES holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

TRUT vs UTES Cost

Overpaying UTES vs TRUT

$6,860

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • TRUT 0.14%

    $2,932

  • UTES 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • TRUT 0.14%
  • UTES 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530UTES $9,792TRUT $2,932

Year by year

YearTRUTUTESOverpaying
10$256$883$627
20$1,000$3,394$2,394
30$2,932$9,792$6,860

Expense ratio

  • 0.14%TRUT, cheaper
  • 0.49%UTES
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TRUT 3rd cheapest of 35 funds

UTES 8th cheapest of 35 funds

TRUT vs UTES Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
TRUT 0.35%
UTES 1.60%, better
Payout (12M)
TRUT $0.11
UTES $1.23
Last payment
TRUT $0.03
UTES $0.26
Ex-dividend
TRUT Oct 1, 2026
UTES Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
TRUT Oct 6, 2026
UTES Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
TRUT Quarterly
UTES Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

TRUTQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll TRUT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Oct 1, 2025 $0.01; Dec 29, 2025 $0.02; Apr 1, 2026 $0.03; Jul 1, 2026 $0.03; Oct 1, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
UTESQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll UTES payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.12; Jun 20, 2017 $0.18; Sep 20, 2017 $0.18; Dec 20, 2017 $0.44; Mar 20, 2018 $0.13; Jun 20, 2018 $0.19; Sep 20, 2018 $0.19; Dec 20, 2018 $0.23; Mar 20, 2019 $0.14; Jun 20, 2019 $0.19; Sep 20, 2019 $0.20; Dec 20, 2019 $0.23; Mar 20, 2020 $0.16; Jun 22, 2020 $0.21; Sep 21, 2020 $0.22; Dec 21, 2020 $0.25; Mar 22, 2021 $0.18; Jun 21, 2021 $0.23; Sep 20, 2021 $0.24; Dec 20, 2021 $0.27; Mar 21, 2022 $0.20; Jun 21, 2022 $0.23; Sep 20, 2022 $0.26; Dec 20, 2022 $0.31; Mar 20, 2023 $0.23; Jun 20, 2023 $0.26; Sep 20, 2023 $0.27; Dec 20, 2023 $0.33; Mar 20, 2024 $0.26; Jun 20, 2024 $0.26; Sep 20, 2024 $0.17; Dec 20, 2024 $0.27; Mar 20, 2025 $0.26; Jun 20, 2025 $0.24; Sep 22, 2025 $0.22; Dec 22, 2025 $0.40; Mar 20, 2026 $0.32; Jun 22, 2026 $0.25; Sep 21, 2026 $0.26. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

TRUT vs UTES Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
TRUT 26.8%since Sep 2025UTES 20.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
TRUT 0.78since Sep 2025UTES 0.96
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
TRUT −18.6%since Aug 2025UTES −20.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
TRUT 1.76UTES 0.74

TRUT and UTES in the news

Popular comparisons

  • TRUTAvsAVREA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UTESBvsAVREA

    Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsPSRA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UTESBvsPSRA

    Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsTMEDB

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UTESBvsTMEDB

    Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.