TRUT ranks 4th and USNG 11th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.
TRUT vs USNG
TRUT −0.45pt a year
0.14%0.59%
TRUT 36.3×the volume
182K5.02K
TRUT vs USNG Performance
+12.7%+28.4%
- TRUT 0.14%, better
- USNG 0.59%
- TRUT $238M
- USNG $11M
- TRUT +12.7%
- USNG +28.4%, better
- TRUT 0.35%
- USNG 1.27%, better
- TRUT 77
- USNG 27
- TRUT 182K sh, better
- USNG 5.02K sh
- TRUT $31.15
- USNG $35.36
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TRUT | USNG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | B65 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F23 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | D31 | C46Higher |
| Durability | B61Higher | C40 |
Rank among US Active Sector funds
Same Category. TRUT and USNG are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TRUTA
USNGB
In short
TRUT Diversification rules force most tech ETFs to trim their biggest names. TRUT's answer: own the giants directly up to the legal line, then top up with sector ETFs so the portfolio mirrors the sector's real shape.
USNG Most energy funds hand you the whole barrel. USNG tracks one molecule: natural gas, from wellhead to pipeline to export dock, in a compact active portfolio of roughly 25 US-listed names picked on growth at a reasonable price.
Stated mandate
TRUT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment in securities of information technology-related companies or instruments providing exposure to them.
USNG USNG seeks long-term capital appreciation through primarily U.S.-listed equity securities of natural gas companies benefiting from the U.S. natural gas infrastructure ecosystem across upstream, midstream, and downstream segments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TRUT vs USNG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TRUT vs USNG Cost
Overpaying USNG vs TRUT
$8,703
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TRUT 0.14%
$2,932
USNG 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TRUT | USNG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $256 | $1,058 | $802 |
| 20 | $1,000 | $4,051 | $3,051 |
| 30 | $2,932 | $11,635 | $8,703 |
- 0.14%TRUT, cheaper
- 0.59%USNG
- Middle half of US Active Sector funds
- Median 0.61%
TRUT 3rd cheapest of 35 funds
USNG 12th cheapest of 35 funds
TRUT vs USNG Dividends
- TRUT 0.35%
- USNG 1.27%, better
- TRUT $0.11
- USNG $0.45
- TRUT $0.03
- USNG $0.12
- TRUT Oct 1, 2026
- USNG Sep 29, 2026
- TRUT Oct 6, 2026
- USNG Sep 30, 2026
- TRUT Quarterly
- USNG Quarterly
Distribution history
TRUT vs USNG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TRUT 26.8%USNG 15.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- TRUT 0.78USNG 1.41
- Worst fall
- TRUT −18.6%USNG −11.9%
- Market sensitivity
- TRUT 1.76USNG 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.14% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.