VONV ranks 1st and TMFE 84th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
TMFE vs VONV
VONV −0.44pt a year
0.50%0.06%
VONV 77.5×the volume
9.98K774K
VONV +4.1pt
+19.1%+23.2%
TMFE vs VONV Performance
+2.9%+28.5%
- TMFE 0.50%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- TMFE $74M
- VONV $23.3B
- TMFE +2.9%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- TMFE 0.31%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- TMFE 101
- VONV 873
- TMFE 9.98K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- TMFE $30.26
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TMFE | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A71 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C40 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | D27 | C49Higher |
| Durability | D31 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. TMFE and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TMFEC
VONVA
In short
TMFE Stock-picking research in an index wrapper. TMFE screens The Motley Fool's own recommendation universe down to the 100 most capital-efficient companies, then caps each position at 4.8%.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
TMFE The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the proprietary Capital Efficiency 100 Index.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TMFE vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TMFE vs VONV Cost
Overpaying TMFE vs VONV
$8,709
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TMFE 0.50%
$9,979
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TMFE | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $110 | $790 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $432 | $3,028 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,270 | $8,709 |
- 0.50%TMFE
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
TMFE 75th cheapest of 99 funds
TMFE vs VONV Dividends
- TMFE 0.31%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- TMFE $0.09
- VONV $1.74
- TMFE $0.09
- VONV $0.42
- TMFE Dec 18, 2025
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- TMFE Dec 19, 2025
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- TMFE Annual
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
TMFE vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TMFE 13.1%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- TMFE 1.07VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- TMFE −31.1%VONV −18.9%
- Market sensitivity
- TMFE 0.94VONV 0.85
TMFE and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

