TSDD ranks 1st and TSLZ 14th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
TSDD vs TSLZ
0.0%by weight
TSDD −0.07pt a year
0.98%1.05%
TSDD 4.1×the volume
10.1M2.47M
TSDD +1.0pt
−72.5%−73.5%
TSDD vs TSLZ Performance
−12.5%−14.3%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- TSLZ 1.05%
- TSDD $33M
- TSLZ $31M
- TSDD −12.5%, better
- TSLZ −14.3%
- TSDD 8.82%, better
- TSLZ 0.73%
- TSDD 1
- TSLZ 2
- TSDD 10.1M sh, better
- TSLZ 2.47M sh
- TSDD $8.06
- TSLZ $12.13
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TSDD | TSLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | B65 |
| Mission | A98 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C50 | C50 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A72Higher | B64 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. TSDD and TSLZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TSDDA
TSLZB
In short
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
TSLZ Shorting Tesla without a margin account. TSLZ uses swaps to aim for -2x Tesla's move each trading day, resets at the close, and is the cheaper of the two double-short Tesla funds. Built for day-scale trades, not the long haul.
Stated mandate
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
TSLZ The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to -200% of the daily performance of Tesla, Inc., before fees and expenses. It is intended as a short-term trading vehicle and is not designed to track Tesla over periods longer than one trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TSDD vs TSLZ Holdings
How TSDD and TSLZ differ
0.0%
About this figure: TSDD gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
TSLZ gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TSLZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for TSLZ.
Concentration
- TSDD200.2%
- TSLZ158.4%
- TSDD1
- TSLZ1
Asset class
- TSDD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- TSLZ
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in TSDD1
- In both0
- Only in TSLZ1
Only in TSDD
1 security, 100% of TSDD by weight
- Tsla200.23%
Only in TSLZ
1 security, 71.7% of TSLZ by weight
- Recv Tslz Trs Tsla Eq71.73%
Weight gaps
TSDD and TSLZ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TSDD vs TSLZ Cost
Overpaying TSLZ vs TSDD
$1,133
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
TSLZ 1.05%
$19,495
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TSDD | TSLZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $1,847 | $118 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $6,927 | $423 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $19,495 | $1,133 |
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- 1.05%TSLZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
TSLZ 20th cheapest of 43 funds
TSDD vs TSLZ Dividends
- TSDD 8.82%, better
- TSLZ 0.73%
- TSDD $0.65
- TSLZ $0.08
- TSDD $0.65
- TSLZ $0.08
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- TSLZ Dec 24, 2025
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- TSLZ Dec 26, 2025
- TSDD Irregular
- TSLZ Annual
Distribution history
TSDD vs TSLZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TSDD 100.6%, betterTSLZ 103.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- TSDD −0.87TSLZ −0.87Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- TSDD −99.1%TSLZ −99.2%
- Market sensitivity
- TSDD −2.40TSLZ −2.32
TSDD and TSLZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
