AMZD ranks 4th and TSLZ 14th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMZD vs TSLZ
0.0%by weight
AMZD −0.03pt a year
1.02%1.05%
AMZD 5.0×the volume
12.3M2.47M
AMZD +52.2pt
−21.3%−73.5%
AMZD vs TSLZ Performance
−11.3%−14.3%
- AMZD 1.02%, better
- TSLZ 1.05%
- AMZD $16M
- TSLZ $31M
- AMZD −11.3%, better
- TSLZ −14.3%
- AMZD 2.87%, better
- TSLZ 0.73%
- AMZD 3
- TSLZ 2
- AMZD 12.3M sh, better
- TSLZ 2.47M sh
- AMZD $8.30
- TSLZ $12.13
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZD | TSLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | B65 |
| Mission | A98 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B67Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A71Higher | B64 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMZD and TSLZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZDA
TSLZB
In short
AMZD Most single-stock bear funds reach for leverage. AMZD skips it: one dollar down for every dollar Amazon rises, for a single trading day, through swaps you buy like any share. 1.02% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
TSLZ Shorting Tesla without a margin account. TSLZ uses swaps to aim for -2x Tesla's move each trading day, resets at the close, and is the cheaper of the two double-short Tesla funds. Built for day-scale trades, not the long haul.
Stated mandate
AMZD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results tied to AMZN and is materially different from ordinary exchange-traded funds.
TSLZ The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to -200% of the daily performance of Tesla, Inc., before fees and expenses. It is intended as a short-term trading vehicle and is not designed to track Tesla over periods longer than one trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZD vs TSLZ Holdings
How AMZD and TSLZ differ
0.0%
About this figure: AMZD gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
TSLZ gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMZD and TSLZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for AMZD and TSLZ.
Concentration
- AMZD1594.7%
- TSLZ158.4%
- AMZD0
- TSLZ1
Asset class
- AMZD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- TSLZ
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in AMZD0
- In both0
- Only in TSLZ1
Only in AMZD
0 securities, 0.0% of AMZD by weight
Only in TSLZ
1 security, 71.7% of TSLZ by weight
- Recv Tslz Trs Tsla Eq71.73%
Weight gaps
AMZD and TSLZ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZD vs TSLZ Cost
Overpaying TSLZ vs AMZD
$483
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZD 1.02%
$19,012
TSLZ 1.05%
$19,495
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZD | TSLZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $1,847 | $50 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $6,927 | $181 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $19,495 | $483 |
- 1.02%AMZD, cheaper
- 1.05%TSLZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AMZD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
TSLZ 20th cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD vs TSLZ Dividends
- AMZD 2.87%, better
- TSLZ 0.73%
- AMZD $0.24
- TSLZ $0.08
- AMZD $0.05
- TSLZ $0.08
- AMZD Sep 22, 2026
- TSLZ Dec 24, 2025
- AMZD Sep 29, 2026
- TSLZ Dec 26, 2025
- AMZD Quarterly
- TSLZ Annual
Distribution history
AMZD vs TSLZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZD 27.4%, betterTSLZ 103.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZD −0.86, betterTSLZ −0.87
- Worst fall
- AMZD −74.7%TSLZ −99.2%
- Market sensitivity
- AMZD −1.36TSLZ −2.32
AMZD and TSLZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
