UNHG ranks 2nd and TSMU 92nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
TSMU vs UNHG
UNHG −0.73pt a year
1.50%0.77%
UNHG 12.2×the volume
59.7K726K
TSMU vs UNHG Performance
+34.9%+11.9%
- TSMU 1.50%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- TSMU $43M
- UNHG $63M
- TSMU +34.9%, better
- UNHG +11.9%
- TSMU 2
- UNHG 5
- TSMU 59.7K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- TSMU $68.46
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TSMU | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A98Higher | A90 |
| Risk | A84Higher | A83 |
| Tradability | A79 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A78Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. TSMU and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TSMUC
UNHGA
In short
TSMU Two US ETFs aim at twice Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, and this is one of them. Straight 2x daily exposure to the world's largest contract chipmaker, at a fee that sits well above the leveraged single-stock norm.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
TSMU The fund seeks daily, before-fee-and-expense investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TSMU vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TSMU vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying TSMU vs UNHG
$11,454
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TSMU 1.50%
$26,283
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TSMU | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $1,371 | $1,219 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $5,205 | $4,314 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $14,829 | $11,454 |
- 1.50%TSMU
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
TSMU 271st cheapest of 315 funds
TSMU vs UNHG Dividends
- TSMU None
- UNHG
- TSMU
- UNHG $1.90
- TSMU
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- TSMU
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- TSMU
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
TSMU vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TSMU 73.6%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- TSMU 1.01UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- TSMU −63.7%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- TSMU 3.42UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.