USCL ranks 7th and WOMN 44th of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
USCL vs WOMN
USCL −0.67pt a year
0.08%0.75%
USCL 8.6×the volume
13.1K1.53K
USCL +4.7pt
+19.9%+15.2%
USCL vs WOMN Performance
+9.6%+12.0%
- USCL 0.08%, better
- WOMN 0.75%
- USCL $2.61B
- WOMN $57M
- USCL +9.6%
- WOMN +12.0%, better
- USCL 1.06%, better
- WOMN 0.82%
- USCL 393
- WOMN 201
- USCL 13.1K sh, better
- WOMN 1.53K sh
- USCL $83.10
- WOMN $44.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | USCL | WOMN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F4 |
| Mission | B61 | |
| Risk | B55 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | B69Higher | F16 |
| Holdings | D34 | B66Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | C41 |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. USCL and WOMN are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
USCLA
WOMND
In short
USCL Most ESG index funds work by exclusion. USCL scores roughly 400 US large and mid caps on where they're heading instead: emissions intensity, reduction targets, green revenue. And it charges 0.08% a year to do it.
WOMN The rare ETF where the fee is part of the pitch: sponsor Impact Shares is itself a 501(c)(3) that routes net advisory profits to YWCA USA, while the portfolio tracks a Morningstar index that scores US companies on gender equality.
Stated mandate
USCL The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies selected for their relative positioning on the transition to a low-carbon economy, using climate-related measures such as emissions intensity, reduction targets, green-business revenue, and climate-risk management.
WOMN The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Morningstar Women’s Empowerment Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
USCL vs WOMN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
USCL vs WOMN Cost
Overpaying WOMN vs USCL
$12,793
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
USCL 0.08%
$1,689
WOMN 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | USCL | WOMN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $1,336 | $1,189 |
| 20 | $575 | $5,078 | $4,503 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $14,482 | $12,793 |
- 0.08%USCL, cheaper
- 0.75%WOMN
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
USCL cheapest of 47 funds
WOMN 45th cheapest of 47 funds
USCL vs WOMN Dividends
- USCL 1.06%, better
- WOMN 0.82%
- USCL $0.91
- WOMN $0.37
- USCL $0.20
- WOMN $0.11
- USCL Sep 15, 2026
- WOMN Sep 29, 2026
- USCL Sep 18, 2026
- WOMN Sep 30, 2026
- USCL Quarterly
- WOMN Quarterly
Distribution history
USCL vs WOMN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- USCL 12.5%WOMN 11.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- USCL 1.28, betterWOMN 1.02
- Worst fall
- USCL −19.0%WOMN −25.8%
- Market sensitivity
- USCL 1.01WOMN 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.