Skip to content
etf.net

UXAP vs XDSQ

FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April

UXAPDCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF

XDSQBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XDSQ −0.06pt a year

UXAP0.85%XDSQ0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

XDSQ 10.7×the volume

UXAP1.3KXDSQ13.9K

UXAP vs XDSQ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.6%UXAP+9.3%XDSQ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. UXAP +10.6%. XDSQ +9.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
UXAP 0.85%
XDSQ 0.79%, better
Fund size
UXAP $13M
XDSQ $69M
1Y total return
UXAP +10.6%, better
XDSQ +9.3%
Holdings
UXAP 3
XDSQ 4
Avg volume (30D)
UXAP 1.3K sh
XDSQ 13.9K sh, better
NAV per share
UXAP $43.18
XDSQ $44.41
52W range

ETF.net Grade

UXAP: Cost 24, Risk 29, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings not scored, Durability 52. XDSQ: Cost 63, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings 57, Durability 80.
Pillar letters and Scores for UXAP, XDSQ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarUXAPXDSQ
Cost30% weightF24B63Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD29D37Higher
Tradability15% weightD39A78Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB57
Durability5% weightC52A80Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. UXAP and XDSQ are both graded against the same 12 S&P 500 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Accelerated⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

XDSQ ranks 3rd and UXAP 8th of 12 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated Category.

  1. Rank 1ATWOXiShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BXTAPInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETFScore 65
  3. Rank 3BXDSQInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BXTJAInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 7DDGAPFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - AprilScore 39
  6. Rank 8DUXAPFT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - AprilScore 30
  7. Rank 9DUXJAFT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - JanuaryScore 28

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

UXAPDFT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April

XDSQBInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF

In short

UXAP No data

XDSQ Twice the upside of its S&P 500 reference fund up to a cap, with roughly the full downside. XDSQ runs that trade on a three-month clock, so the cap resets four times a year instead of once.

Stated mandate

UXAP No data

XDSQ The fund seeks to deliver twice the upside performance of SPY, subject to a cap, while approximately matching SPY's downside over a quarterly outcome period.

Why people hold it

UXAP No data

  • XDSQ Doubles the reference ETF's move up to a cap and tracks its losses roughly one-for-one. Built from FLEX options on the S&P 500 ETF, not borrowed money or a daily reset.innovatoretfs.comsec.gov
  • The outcome period runs three months, so a fresh cap is priced off current market conditions four times a year rather than being locked in for twelve.globenewswire.cominnovatoretfs.com
  • Innovator's Accelerated line pioneered multiple-upside-to-a-cap with roughly single downside exposure, and XDSQ has run the quarterly version of it since 2021.globenewswire.com
  • Costs 0.79% a year, the median for its accelerated-outcome peer group and under the 0.85% on FT Vest's enhance-and-buffer funds XMAR and XJUN.

Worth knowing

UXAP No data

  • XDSQ No buffer here. A fall in the S&P 500 ETF passes through roughly one-for-one, and the doubled upside stops at the cap.innovatoretfs.com
  • The stated outcomes assume holding from the first day of a quarter's period to the last. Buy or sell mid-period and your effective cap and exposure differ.sec.gov
  • The strategy is built on the reference ETF's price return, so S&P 500 dividends do not pass through to shareholders.sec.gov

Full UXAP profile⁠

Full XDSQ profile⁠

UXAP vs XDSQ Holdings

How UXAP and XDSQ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of UXAP and 0.0% of XDSQ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for UXAP.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in UXAP and XDSQ, widest gap first
CountryMore in UXAPMore in XDSQ
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • UXAP109.8%
  • XDSQ101.8%

Securities held

  • UXAP2
  • XDSQ4

Asset class

UXAP
Multi-Asset
XDSQ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in UXAP2
  • In both0
  • Only in XDSQ4

Only in UXAP

2 securities, 100% of UXAP by weight

  • 2027-04-16 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 14.2097.97%
  • 2027-04-16 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 724.3410.12%

Only in XDSQ

4 securities, 100% of XDSQ by weight

  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF99.35%
  • Voo 12/31/2026 700.88 C2.37%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.05%

Weight gaps

UXAP and XDSQ share no securities.

All 3 UXAP holdings⁠All 5 XDSQ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

UXAP vs XDSQ Cost

Overpaying UXAP vs XDSQ

$1,025

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • UXAP 0.85%

    $16,199

  • XDSQ 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • UXAP 0.85%
  • XDSQ 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530UXAP $16,199XDSQ $15,174

Year by year

YearUXAPXDSQOverpaying
10$1,508$1,405$103
20$5,706$5,331$375
30$16,199$15,174$1,025

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%UXAP
  • 0.79%XDSQ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated funds
  • Median 0.79%

XDSQ 3rd cheapest of 12 funds

UXAP 8th cheapest of 12 funds

UXAP vs XDSQ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
UXAP None
XDSQ None

Distribution history

UXAPAll UXAP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XDSQAll XDSQ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

UXAP vs XDSQ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
UXAP 13.8%since May 2025XDSQ 10.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
UXAP 1.38since May 2025XDSQ 1.22
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
UXAP −10.4%since Apr 2025XDSQ −26.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
UXAP 1.14XDSQ 0.82

Popular comparisons

  • UXAPDvsTWOXA

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April · iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XDSQBvsTWOXA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF · iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UXAPDvsXTAPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XDSQBvsXTAPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UXAPDvsXTJAB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XDSQBvsXTJAB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.