VYM ranks 2nd and VFMF 30th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
VFMF vs VYM
VYM −0.14pt a year
0.18%0.04%
VYM 18.5×the volume
61.6K1.14M
VFMF +2.6pt
+14.4%+11.8%
VFMF vs VYM Performance
+95.6%+74.3%
- VFMF 0.18%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- VFMF $1.1B
- VYM $95.8B
- VFMF +33.1%, better
- VYM +19.3%
- VFMF 1.37%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- VFMF 707
- VYM 601
- VFMF 61.6K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- VFMF $187.68
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | VFMF | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77 | A99Higher |
| Mission | B64 | A79Higher |
| Risk | A70 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A72Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A73 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. VFMF and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
VFMFB
VYMA
In short
VFMF Three factor bets in one Vanguard wrapper: a quantitative model sifts the broad U.S. market down to roughly 600 stocks tilted toward momentum, quality and value, for 0.18% a year (about half the going rate in the multifactor aisle).
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
VFMF Seeks long-term capital appreciation by using a quantitative model to build a diversified U.S. common-stock portfolio with exposure to momentum, quality, and value characteristics.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
VFMF vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
VFMF vs VYM Cost
Overpaying VFMF vs VYM
$2,900
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
VFMF 0.18%
$3,749
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | VFMF | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $73 | $255 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $288 | $993 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $849 | $2,900 |
- 0.18%VFMF
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
VFMF 24th cheapest of 99 funds
VFMF vs VYM Dividends
- VFMF 1.37%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- VFMF $2.58
- VYM $3.68
- VFMF $0.60
- VYM $0.89
- VFMF Sep 23, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- VFMF Sep 25, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- VFMF Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
VFMF vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- VFMF
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- VFMF 14.2%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- VFMF 1.39, betterVYM 1.38
- Worst fall
- VFMF −20.6%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- VFMF 0.94VYM 0.75
VFMF and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



