VONV ranks 1st and VFMF 30th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
VFMF vs VONV
VONV −0.12pt a year
0.18%0.06%
VONV 12.6×the volume
61.6K774K
VFMF +2.7pt
+14.4%+11.7%
VFMF vs VONV Performance
+95.6%+73.8%
- VFMF 0.18%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- VFMF $1.1B
- VONV $23.3B
- VFMF +33.1%, better
- VONV +28.5%
- VFMF 1.37%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- VFMF 707
- VONV 873
- VFMF 61.6K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- VFMF $187.68
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | VFMF | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B64 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A70 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | A72Higher | C49 |
| Durability | A73 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. VFMF and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
VFMFB
VONVA
In short
VFMF Three factor bets in one Vanguard wrapper: a quantitative model sifts the broad U.S. market down to roughly 600 stocks tilted toward momentum, quality and value, for 0.18% a year (about half the going rate in the multifactor aisle).
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
VFMF Seeks long-term capital appreciation by using a quantitative model to build a diversified U.S. common-stock portfolio with exposure to momentum, quality, and value characteristics.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
VFMF vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
VFMF vs VONV Cost
Overpaying VFMF vs VONV
$2,479
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
VFMF 0.18%
$3,749
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | VFMF | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $110 | $218 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $432 | $849 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $1,270 | $2,479 |
- 0.18%VFMF
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
VFMF 24th cheapest of 99 funds
VFMF vs VONV Dividends
- VFMF 1.37%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- VFMF $2.58
- VONV $1.74
- VFMF $0.60
- VONV $0.42
- VFMF Sep 23, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- VFMF Sep 25, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- VFMF Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
VFMF vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- VFMF
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- VFMF 14.2%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- VFMF 1.39VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- VFMF −20.6%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- VFMF 0.94VONV 0.85
VFMF and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

