VGIT ranks 1st and XFIV 6th of 19 funds in the Treasuries (3-10 Year) Category.
VGIT vs XFIV
VGIT −0.02pt a year
0.03%0.05%
VGIT 59.8×the volume
4.84M80.8K
XFIV +0.1pt
+4.5%+4.6%
VGIT vs XFIV Performance
−0.2%−0.5%
- VGIT 0.03%, better
- XFIV 0.05%
- VGIT $47.8B
- XFIV $353M
- VGIT −0.2%, better
- XFIV −0.5%
- VGIT 3.97%
- XFIV 3.98%, better
- VGIT 105
- XFIV 50
- VGIT 4.84M sh, better
- XFIV 80.8K sh
- VGIT $57.72
- XFIV $47.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | VGIT | XFIV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | B67 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61 | B61 |
| Tradability | B66 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | A87Higher | C52 |
| Durability | A95Higher | C49 |
Rank among Treasuries (3-10 Year) funds
Same Category. VGIT and XFIV are both graded against the same 19 Treasuries (3-10 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
VGITA
XFIVA
In short
VGIT The middle of the Treasury curve, priced like an afterthought. VGIT holds government bonds maturing in 3 to 10 years for 0.03% a year, a quarter of what the typical Treasury fund in its peer group charges.
XFIV Most "intermediate" Treasury funds sort bonds by maturity and let their interest-rate sensitivity wander. XFIV pins it down: two duration buckets, blended every month, to hold the portfolio near the five-year point on the curve.
Stated mandate
VGIT Seeks to track a market-weighted Treasury bond index while maintaining an intermediate-term dollar-weighted average maturity.
XFIV The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. Treasury securities with duration between 4 and 6 years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
VGIT vs XFIV Holdings
How VGIT and XFIV differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for XFIV.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in VGITMore in XFIV | VGIT | XFIV |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- VGIT18.4%
- XFIV35.5%
- VGIT102
- XFIV49
Asset class
- VGIT
- Fixed Income
- XFIV
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. VGIT holds 102 securities, XFIV 49.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
VGIT vs XFIV Cost
Overpaying XFIV vs VGIT
$422
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
VGIT 0.03%
$638
XFIV 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | VGIT | XFIV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $92 | $37 |
| 20 | $216 | $360 | $144 |
| 30 | $638 | $1,060 | $422 |
- 0.03%VGIT, cheaper
- 0.05%XFIV
- Middle half of Treasuries (3-10 Year) funds
- Median 0.12%
VGIT cheapest of 19 funds
XFIV 5th cheapest of 19 funds
VGIT vs XFIV Dividends
- VGIT 3.97%
- XFIV 3.98%, better
- VGIT $2.29
- XFIV $1.89
- VGIT $0.19
- XFIV $0.16
- VGIT Oct 1, 2026
- XFIV Oct 1, 2026
- VGIT Oct 5, 2026
- XFIV Oct 6, 2026
- VGIT Monthly
- XFIV Monthly
Distribution history
VGIT vs XFIV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- VGIT 4.7%, betterXFIV 4.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- VGIT 0.02XFIV 0.02Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- VGIT −13.8%XFIV −6.4%
- Market sensitivity
- VGIT 0.78XFIV 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.