VSDM ranks 2nd and ZMUN 24th of 27 funds in the Short-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
VSDM vs ZMUN
VSDM −0.18pt a year
0.12%0.30%
VSDM 41.6×the volume
258K6.21K
VSDM vs ZMUN Performance
+2.1%+3.3%
- VSDM 0.12%, better
- ZMUN 0.30%
- VSDM $1.2B
- ZMUN $37M
- VSDM +2.1%
- ZMUN +3.3%, better
- VSDM 3.38%
- ZMUN 3.79%, better
- VSDM 3315
- ZMUN 164
- VSDM 258K sh, better
- ZMUN 6.21K sh
- VSDM $75.79
- ZMUN $49.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | VSDM | ZMUN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85Higher | F19 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C48 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | A79Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | D32 |
| Durability | B62Higher | D29 |
Rank among Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. VSDM and ZMUN are both graded against the same 27 Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
VSDMA
ZMUNC
In short
ZMUN The first ETF built purely on callable munis, tracking an index F/m co-developed with Bloomberg. It buys investment-grade tax-exempt bonds already callable or callable within three months, which keeps the maturity clock very short.
Stated mandate
ZMUN The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling approach focused on U.S. tax-exempt investment-grade municipal bonds that are currently callable or callable within three months.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
VSDM vs ZMUN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
VSDM vs ZMUN Cost
Overpaying ZMUN vs VSDM
$3,629
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
VSDM 0.12%
$2,520
ZMUN 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | VSDM | ZMUN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $545 | $325 |
| 20 | $859 | $2,113 | $1,254 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $6,149 | $3,629 |
- 0.12%VSDM, cheaper
- 0.30%ZMUN
- Middle half of Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.21%
VSDM 5th cheapest of 27 funds
ZMUN 22nd cheapest of 27 funds
VSDM vs ZMUN Dividends
- VSDM 3.38%
- ZMUN 3.79%, better
- VSDM $2.56
- ZMUN $1.89
- VSDM $0.19
- ZMUN $0.17
- VSDM Nov 2, 2026
- ZMUN Oct 27, 2026
- VSDM Pays Nov 4, 2026
- ZMUN Oct 28, 2026
- VSDM Monthly
- ZMUN Monthly
Distribution history
VSDM vs ZMUN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- VSDM 2.9%ZMUN 1.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- VSDM −0.26ZMUN −0.35
- Worst fall
- VSDM −2.8%ZMUN −1.0%
- Market sensitivity
- VSDM 0.09ZMUN −0.004
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.