SUB ranks 2nd and ZMUN 24th of 27 funds in the Short-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
SUB vs ZMUN
SUB −0.23pt a year
0.07%0.30%
SUB 138.5×the volume
860K6.21K
SUB vs ZMUN Performance
+2.1%+3.3%
- SUB 0.07%, better
- ZMUN 0.30%
- SUB $13.3B
- ZMUN $37M
- SUB +2.1%
- ZMUN +3.3%, better
- SUB 2.79%
- ZMUN 3.79%, better
- SUB 3188
- ZMUN 164
- SUB 860K sh, better
- ZMUN 6.21K sh
- SUB $105.87
- ZMUN $49.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SUB | ZMUN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | F19 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C45 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | B60Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A81Higher | D32 |
| Durability | A94Higher | D29 |
Rank among Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. SUB and ZMUN are both graded against the same 27 Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SUBA
ZMUNC
In short
SUB Munis, but only the near end of the curve. Since 2008 SUB has tracked an AMT-free index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing inside five years, paying tax-exempt income monthly with far less rate sensitivity than long-dated muni funds.
ZMUN The first ETF built purely on callable munis, tracking an index F/m co-developed with Bloomberg. It buys investment-grade tax-exempt bonds already callable or callable within three months, which keeps the maturity clock very short.
Stated mandate
SUB The fund seeks to track an index of short-term, investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds maturing from one month through five years, providing tax-exempt income while managing interest-rate risk.
ZMUN The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling approach focused on U.S. tax-exempt investment-grade municipal bonds that are currently callable or callable within three months.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SUB vs ZMUN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SUB vs ZMUN Cost
Overpaying ZMUN vs SUB
$4,669
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SUB 0.07%
$1,480
ZMUN 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SUB | ZMUN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $545 | $417 |
| 20 | $503 | $2,113 | $1,610 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $6,149 | $4,669 |
- 0.07%SUB, cheaper
- 0.30%ZMUN
- Middle half of Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.21%
SUB 3rd cheapest of 27 funds
ZMUN 22nd cheapest of 27 funds
SUB vs ZMUN Dividends
- SUB 2.79%
- ZMUN 3.79%, better
- SUB $2.95
- ZMUN $1.89
- SUB $0.23
- ZMUN $0.17
- SUB Nov 2, 2026
- ZMUN Oct 27, 2026
- SUB Pays Nov 5, 2026
- ZMUN Oct 28, 2026
- SUB Monthly
- ZMUN Monthly
Distribution history
SUB vs ZMUN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SUB 2.0%ZMUN 1.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- SUB −0.59ZMUN −0.35
- Worst fall
- SUB −4.0%ZMUN −1.0%
- Market sensitivity
- SUB 0.26ZMUN −0.004
SUB and ZMUN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

