VV ranks 4th and XLG 14th of 29 funds in the US Large-Cap Category.
VV vs XLG
VV −0.17pt a year
0.03%0.20%
XLG 5.2×the volume
223K1.17M
XLG +1.3pt
+15.4%+16.7%
VV vs XLG Performance
+73.2%+80.1%
- VV 0.03%, better
- XLG 0.20%
- VV $76B
- XLG $11.5B
- VV +11.5%, better
- XLG +3.3%
- VV 1.03%, better
- XLG 0.64%
- VV 423
- XLG 53
- VV 223K sh
- XLG 1.17M sh, better
- VV $348.06
- XLG $61.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | VV | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A99Higher | A86 |
| Risk | B55Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | B57 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | C51Higher | D27 |
| Durability | A93Higher | A87 |
Rank among US Large-Cap funds
Same Category. VV and XLG are both graded against the same 29 US Large-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
VVA
XLGB
In short
VV Vanguard's rules-based read on large cap: own whatever sits in the top 85% of the US market, about 500 names, for 0.03% a year. Running since 2004.
XLG The S&P 500's top shelf, bottled on its own. About 50 of the largest US companies, weighted by size, tracked since 2005. The same giants a total-market fund owns, without the several hundred smaller names riding behind them.
Stated mandate
VV The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Large Cap Index through a passive, full-replication strategy focused predominantly on large U.S. companies diversified across growth and value styles.
XLG The fund seeks to track the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index by investing at least 90% of assets in securities included in that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
VV vs XLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
VV vs XLG Cost
Overpaying XLG vs VV
$3,517
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
VV 0.03%
$638
XLG 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | VV | XLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $365 | $310 |
| 20 | $216 | $1,421 | $1,205 |
| 30 | $638 | $4,155 | $3,517 |
- 0.03%VV, cheaper
- 0.20%XLG
- Middle half of US Large-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VV 3rd cheapest of 29 funds
XLG 15th cheapest of 29 funds
VV vs XLG Dividends
- VV 1.03%, better
- XLG 0.64%
- VV $3.60
- XLG $0.40
- VV $0.90
- XLG $0.09
- VV Sep 28, 2026
- XLG Sep 21, 2026
- VV Sep 30, 2026
- XLG Sep 25, 2026
- VV Quarterly
- XLG Quarterly
Distribution history
VV vs XLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- VV
- XLG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- VV 12.5%, betterXLG 14.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- VV 1.41, betterXLG 1.23
- Worst fall
- VV −25.7%, betterXLG −28.0%
- Market sensitivity
- VV 1.02XLG 1.06
VV and XLG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

