Skip to content

WX vs YCL

Corgi All World 2x Daily ETF

WXCCboe

ProShares Ultra Yen

YCLBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

WX −0.75pt a year

WX0.20%YCL0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

YCL 115.9×the volume

WX285YCL33K

WX vs YCL Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−3.2%WX+1.2%YCL

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. WX −3.2%. YCL +1.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.4%6%8%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
WX 0.20%, better
YCL 0.95%
Fund size
WX $1M
YCL $29M
1Y total return
WX No data
YCL −8.6%
Holdings
WX 1
YCL 1
Avg volume (30D)
WX 285 sh
YCL 33K sh, better
NAV per share
WX $22.96
YCL $18.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

WX: Cost 100, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings not scored, Durability 23. YCL: Cost 51, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 61, Holdings not scored, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for WX, YCL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarWXYCL
Cost30% weightA100HigherC51
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA71HigherB57
Tradability15% weightD31B61Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF23B69Higher

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. WX and YCL are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

YCL ranks 20th and WX 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 20BUPWProShares Ultra UtilitiesScore 55
  2. Rank 20BYCLProShares Ultra YenScore 55
  3. Rank 22CMAGXRoundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETFScore 54
  4. Rank 37CWLDULeverage Shares 2x Long World SScore 40
  5. Rank 37CWXCorgi All World 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 37CXBIXCorgi U.S. Biotech 2x Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

WXCCorgi All World 2x Daily ETF

YCLBProShares Ultra Yen

In short

WX No data

YCL The only US ETF built to double the yen's daily move against the dollar. A one-day macro tool wrapped as a commodity pool, on the shelf since 2008 for traders with a view on dollar-yen.

Stated mandate

WX No data

YCL YCL seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of the Japanese yen against the U.S. dollar.

Why people hold it

WX No data

  • YCL One of a kind: ProShares states no other ETF targets 2x the daily performance of the yen versus the dollar. The alternative route is futures, forwards or a margin account.proshares.com
  • 0.95% a year sits under the typical fee for leveraged funds, and the fund has been running since 2008, through multiple dollar-yen regimes.
  • The mechanism is plain: two times the yen's daily move against the dollar, reset each day, traded through one ticker in an ordinary brokerage account.proshares.com

Worth knowing

WX No data

  • YCL Daily reset compounds. Over any stretch longer than a day, results can land well away from 2x the yen's move, and choppy currency markets widen that gap.proshares.com
  • Structured as a commodity pool under ProShares Trust II, so it sends a Schedule K-1 at tax time rather than a 1099.proshares.com
  • Trading is light next to the big equity-index leveraged funds like UDOW and QLD, which can show up as wider spreads around the quote.

Full WX profile⁠

Full YCL profile⁠

WX vs YCL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

WX vs YCL Cost

Overpaying YCL vs WX

$13,714

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • WX 0.20%

    $4,155

  • YCL 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • WX 0.20%
  • YCL 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530YCL $17,869WX $4,155

Year by year

YearWXYCLOverpaying
10$365$1,678$1,313
20$1,421$6,322$4,901
30$4,155$17,869$13,714

Expense ratio

  • 0.20%WX, cheaper
  • 0.95%YCL
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

WX cheapest of 95 funds

YCL 32nd cheapest of 95 funds

WX vs YCL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
WX None
YCL None

Distribution history

WXAll WX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

YCLAll YCL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

WX vs YCL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
WX No dataYCL 19.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
WX No dataYCL −0.61
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
WX No dataYCL −65.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
WX 2.76YCL 0.38

Popular comparisons

  • WXCvsQLDA

    Corgi All World 2x Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YCLBvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Yen · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WXCvsUYGA

    Corgi All World 2x Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YCLBvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Yen · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WXCvsROMA

    Corgi All World 2x Daily ETF · ProShares Ultra Technology

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YCLBvsROMA

    ProShares Ultra Yen · ProShares Ultra Technology

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.