QLD ranks 1st and YCL 20th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs YCL
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 125.5×the volume
4.15M33K
QLD +44.4pt
+31.9%−12.5%
QLD vs YCL Performance
+97.9%−62.5%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- YCL 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- YCL $29M
- QLD +10.7%, better
- YCL −8.6%
- QLD 0.15%
- YCL
- QLD 113
- YCL 1
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- YCL 33K sh
- QLD $82.56
- YCL $18.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | YCL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | B69 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and YCL are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
YCLB
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
YCL The only US ETF built to double the yen's daily move against the dollar. A one-day macro tool wrapped as a commodity pool, on the shelf since 2008 for traders with a view on dollar-yen.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
YCL YCL seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of the Japanese yen against the U.S. dollar.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs YCL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs YCL Cost
Overpaying YCL vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
YCL 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | YCL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%YCL
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
YCL 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs YCL Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- YCL
- QLD $0.12
- YCL None
- QLD $0.03
- YCL
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- YCL
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- YCL
- QLD Quarterly
- YCL
Distribution history
QLD vs YCL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- YCL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%YCL 19.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterYCL −0.61
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%, betterYCL −65.4%
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46YCL 0.38
QLD and YCL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
