Skip to content

XDEC vs XMAR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December

XDECCCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

XMARBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

XDEC0.85%XMAR0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

XMAR 1.2×the volume

XDEC7.96KXMAR9.23K

3Y return · a year

XMAR +1.4pt

XDEC+10.0%XMAR+11.4%

XDEC vs XMAR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.8%XDEC+10.7%XMAR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. XDEC +8.8%. XMAR +10.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
XDEC 0.85%
XMAR 0.85%
Fund size
XDEC $208M
XMAR $160M
1Y total return
XDEC +8.8%
XMAR +10.7%, better
Holdings
XDEC 4
XMAR 4
Avg volume (30D)
XDEC 7.96K sh
XMAR 9.23K sh, better
NAV per share
XDEC $43.98
XMAR $43.73
52W range

ETF.net Grade

XDEC: Cost 40, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 36, Holdings 58, Durability 79. XMAR: Cost 40, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 69, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for XDEC, XMAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarXDECXMAR
Cost30% weightC40C40
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC44A76Higher
Tradability15% weightD36C50Higher
Holdings10% weightB58B69Higher
Durability5% weightA79HigherB63

Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. XDEC and XMAR are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 7 ›

XMAR ranks 1st and XDEC 6th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BXMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - MarchScore 54
  2. Rank 2CXNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 52
  3. Rank 4BXJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 50
  4. Rank 6CXDECFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 44
  5. Rank 7CCTAUCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

XDECCFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December

XMARBFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

In short

XDEC Most buffered funds trade upside away for protection. This December-dated First Trust fund goes after both: roughly twice the price gain of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a yearly cap, with the first 15% of losses absorbed.

XMAR Most accelerated ETFs double your upside and hand you the full downside. XMAR runs the accelerator with a net: about twice SPY's price gain up to a yearly cap, plus a 15% cushion against losses.

Stated mandate

XDEC The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to a 10.06% upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the stated outcome period.

XMAR The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a 12.22% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • XDEC Accelerated and buffered in one wrapper: it aims for about 2x the reference ETF's positive price return up to a cap, while absorbing the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period.
  • The reference is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not a custom index built for the product, so the exposure being doubled is plain US large-cap.
  • One rung of a dated ladder. Siblings like XMAR, XJUN and XNOV run the same structure on different reset months, so entry isn't pinned to a single December date.
  • Live since 2021, which puts several full December-to-December outcome periods behind the strategy rather than a single test run.
  • XMAR The rare two-sided deal: roughly 2x any positive price move in SPY up to a cap, with the first 15% of SPY's losses absorbed, over a one-year outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • Innovator's accelerated funds (XDSQ, XTAP) give the 2x kicker with single exposure to the downside. XMAR keeps the kicker and adds the buffer.innovatoretfs.com
  • No maturity date. The cap resets to prevailing market conditions when each March period rolls, so the position can be held across periods without re-buying.businesswire.com
  • Among the stronger builds in a small field of accelerated SPY strategies, with a defined-risk profile that stands out in the group.

Worth knowing

  • XDEC At 0.85% a year it runs above accelerated peers such as XTAP and XDSQ at 0.79%. Layered options structures carry a higher price tag than plain beta.
  • The cap and buffer are engineered for a full outcome period, December to December, and the cap is reset at each new period. Buy mid-period and your own cap and remaining buffer differ from the headline terms.
  • Thinly traded next to mainstream index funds, so limit orders earn their keep. The design targets price return, not an income stream.
  • XMAR Cap and buffer are engineered for the full March-to-March period. Step in or out mid-period and you get different terms than the headline math.ftportfolios.com
  • It references SPY's price return, so S&P 500 dividends sit outside the payoff. Below the buffer, losses track the index one for one.ftportfolios.com
  • 0.85% a year, above the 0.79% typical of its accelerated peers, and it trades thinly, so the spread is part of your cost.

Full XDEC profile⁠

Full XMAR profile⁠

XDEC vs XMAR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

XDEC vs XMAR Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,199

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • XDEC 0.85%

    $16,199

  • XMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • XDEC 0.85%
  • XMAR 0.85%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XDEC $16,199XMAR $16,199

Year by year

YearXDECXMAR
10$1,508$1,508
20$5,706$5,706
30$16,199$16,199

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%XDEC
  • 0.85%XMAR
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds
  • Median 0.85%

XDEC 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

XMAR 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

XDEC vs XMAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
XDEC None
XMAR None

Distribution history

XDECAll XDEC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XMARAll XMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XDEC vs XMAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
XDEC 4.3%XMAR 3.3%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
XDEC 1.23XMAR 1.96, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
XDEC −11.7%since Dec 2021XMAR −7.3%since Mar 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
XDEC 0.30XMAR 0.23

Popular comparisons

  • XDECCvsXNOVC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XMARBvsXNOVC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XDECCvsXSEPC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XMARBvsXSEPC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XDECCvsXJANC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XMARBvsXJANC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.