XJAN ranks 4th and XJUN 4th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer Category.
XJAN vs XJUN
0.5%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.85%0.85%
XJAN 1.8×the volume
12.7K7.24K
XJAN vs XJUN Performance
+8.5%+6.8%
- XJAN 0.85%
- XJUN 0.85%
- XJAN $72M
- XJUN $137M
- XJAN +8.5%, better
- XJUN +6.8%
- XJAN 4
- XJUN 4
- XJAN 12.7K sh, better
- XJUN 7.24K sh
- XJAN $39.37
- XJUN $45.41
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | XJAN | XJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | C40 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C44 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | A83Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | B62 | |
| Durability | C41 | A75Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds
Same Category. XJAN and XJUN are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
XJANC
XJUNB
In short
XJUN The fund that launched First Trust's Enhance & Moderate Buffer line: one wrapper aiming for twice SPY's price gain up to a yearly cap, while absorbing the first 15% of its losses. Options math, reset every June.
Stated mandate
XJUN The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to an 11.04% upside cap. It seeks to protect the first 15% of losses in that reference asset during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
XJAN vs XJUN Holdings
How XJAN and XJUN differ
0.5%
Shared holdings make up 0.9% of XJUN and 0.5% of XJAN.
Level by level
- Holdings0.5%
Sector
No Sector split for XJAN.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in XJANMore in XJUN | XJAN | XJUN |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- XJAN112.8%
- XJUN109.7%
- XJAN3
- XJUN3
Asset class
- XJAN
- Multi-Asset
- XJUN
- Multi-Asset
Holdings
- Only in XJAN3
- In both0
- Only in XJUN3
Only in XJAN
3 securities, 100% of XJAN by weight
- 2027-01-15 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 6.93101.17%
- 2027-01-15 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 691.6710.25%
- 2027-01-15 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 691.670.94%
Only in XJUN
3 securities, 100% of XJUN by weight
- 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.4897.47%
- 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 746.757.47%
- 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 746.753.85%
Weight gaps
XJAN and XJUN share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
XJAN vs XJUN Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,199
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
XJAN 0.85%
$16,199
XJUN 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | XJAN | XJUN |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,508 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,706 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $16,199 |
- 0.85%XJAN
- 0.85%XJUN
- Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds
- Median 0.85%
XJAN 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
XJUN 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
XJAN vs XJUN Dividends
- XJAN None
- XJUN None
Distribution history
XJAN vs XJUN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- XJAN 4.3%XJUN 4.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- XJAN 1.03XJUN 1.52
- Worst fall
- XJAN −10.0%XJUN −9.1%
- Market sensitivity
- XJAN 0.34XJUN 0.30
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.