XMAR ranks 1st and XJUN 4th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer Category.
XJUN vs XMAR
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.85%0.85%
XMAR 1.3×the volume
7.24K9.23K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+11.4%+11.4%
XJUN vs XMAR Performance
+6.8%+10.7%
- XJUN 0.85%
- XMAR 0.85%
- XJUN $137M
- XMAR $160M
- XJUN +6.8%
- XMAR +10.7%, better
- XJUN 4
- XMAR 4
- XJUN 7.24K sh
- XMAR 9.23K sh, better
- XJUN $45.41
- XMAR $43.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | XJUN | XMAR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | C40 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | C50Higher |
| Holdings | B62 | B69Higher |
| Durability | A75Higher | B63 |
Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds
Same Category. XJUN and XMAR are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
XJUNB
XMARB
In short
XJUN The fund that launched First Trust's Enhance & Moderate Buffer line: one wrapper aiming for twice SPY's price gain up to a yearly cap, while absorbing the first 15% of its losses. Options math, reset every June.
XMAR Most accelerated ETFs double your upside and hand you the full downside. XMAR runs the accelerator with a net: about twice SPY's price gain up to a yearly cap, plus a 15% cushion against losses.
Stated mandate
XJUN The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to an 11.04% upside cap. It seeks to protect the first 15% of losses in that reference asset during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 outcome period.
XMAR The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a 12.22% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
XJUN vs XMAR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
XJUN vs XMAR Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,199
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
XJUN 0.85%
$16,199
XMAR 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | XJUN | XMAR |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,508 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,706 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $16,199 |
- 0.85%XJUN
- 0.85%XMAR
- Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds
- Median 0.85%
XJUN 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
XMAR 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
XJUN vs XMAR Dividends
- XJUN None
- XMAR None
Distribution history
XJUN vs XMAR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- XJUN 4.3%XMAR 3.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- XJUN 1.52XMAR 1.96, better
- Worst fall
- XJUN −9.1%XMAR −7.3%
- Market sensitivity
- XJUN 0.30XMAR 0.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.