Skip to content

XJUN vs XMAR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June

XJUNBCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

XMARBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

XJUN0.85%XMAR0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

XMAR 1.3×the volume

XJUN7.24KXMAR9.23K

3Y return · a year

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

XJUN+11.4%XMAR+11.4%

XJUN vs XMAR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.8%XJUN+10.7%XMAR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. XJUN +6.8%. XMAR +10.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
XJUN 0.85%
XMAR 0.85%
Fund size
XJUN $137M
XMAR $160M
1Y total return
XJUN +6.8%
XMAR +10.7%, better
Holdings
XJUN 4
XMAR 4
Avg volume (30D)
XJUN 7.24K sh
XMAR 9.23K sh, better
NAV per share
XJUN $45.41
XMAR $43.73
52W range

ETF.net Grade

XJUN: Cost 40, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 62, Durability 75. XMAR: Cost 40, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 69, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for XJUN, XMAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarXJUNXMAR
Cost30% weightC40C40
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB62A76Higher
Tradability15% weightC45C50Higher
Holdings10% weightB62B69Higher
Durability5% weightA75HigherB63

Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. XJUN and XMAR are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 7 ›

XMAR ranks 1st and XJUN 4th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BXMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - MarchScore 54
  2. Rank 2CXNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 52
  3. Rank 4CXJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 50
  4. Rank 4BXJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 50
  5. Rank 6CXDECFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

XJUNBFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June

XMARBFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

In short

XJUN The fund that launched First Trust's Enhance & Moderate Buffer line: one wrapper aiming for twice SPY's price gain up to a yearly cap, while absorbing the first 15% of its losses. Options math, reset every June.

XMAR Most accelerated ETFs double your upside and hand you the full downside. XMAR runs the accelerator with a net: about twice SPY's price gain up to a yearly cap, plus a 15% cushion against losses.

Stated mandate

XJUN The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to an 11.04% upside cap. It seeks to protect the first 15% of losses in that reference asset during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 outcome period.

XMAR The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a 12.22% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • XJUN Two jobs, one ticker: approximately 2x the reference SPY ETF's positive price move up to a stated cap, with the first 15% of its losses buffered over a June-to-June outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • The series original. XJUN opened First Trust's Enhance & Moderate Buffer lineup in 2021, giving the doubled-upside-plus-buffer design its longest live track record.etfgi.com
  • The terms are contractual, not discretionary: the fund holds FLEX options on SPY, and each period's cap and buffer are published before the window starts.ftportfolios.com
  • The same design resets in other calendar months (XMAR, XNOV, XDEC), so the June window can be one rung of a ladder rather than a single dated bet.
  • XMAR The rare two-sided deal: roughly 2x any positive price move in SPY up to a cap, with the first 15% of SPY's losses absorbed, over a one-year outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • Innovator's accelerated funds (XDSQ, XTAP) give the 2x kicker with single exposure to the downside. XMAR keeps the kicker and adds the buffer.innovatoretfs.com
  • No maturity date. The cap resets to prevailing market conditions when each March period rolls, so the position can be held across periods without re-buying.businesswire.com
  • Among the stronger builds in a small field of accelerated SPY strategies, with a defined-risk profile that stands out in the group.

Worth knowing

  • XJUN The cap is what pays for the doubled upside: gains past it stay with the market. The deal also tracks SPY's price only, so its dividends sit outside the math.ftportfolios.com
  • 0.85% a year, above accelerated-structure peers such as XTAP and XDSQ at 0.79%.
  • Cap and buffer are engineered for the full outcome period; mid-period buyers get different effective terms. Volume is light, so limit orders are the norm.ftportfolios.com
  • XMAR Cap and buffer are engineered for the full March-to-March period. Step in or out mid-period and you get different terms than the headline math.ftportfolios.com
  • It references SPY's price return, so S&P 500 dividends sit outside the payoff. Below the buffer, losses track the index one for one.ftportfolios.com
  • 0.85% a year, above the 0.79% typical of its accelerated peers, and it trades thinly, so the spread is part of your cost.

Full XJUN profile⁠

Full XMAR profile⁠

XJUN vs XMAR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

XJUN vs XMAR Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,199

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • XJUN 0.85%

    $16,199

  • XMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • XJUN 0.85%
  • XMAR 0.85%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XJUN $16,199XMAR $16,199

Year by year

YearXJUNXMAR
10$1,508$1,508
20$5,706$5,706
30$16,199$16,199

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%XJUN
  • 0.85%XMAR
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds
  • Median 0.85%

XJUN 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

XMAR 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

XJUN vs XMAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
XJUN None
XMAR None

Distribution history

XJUNAll XJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XMARAll XMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XJUN vs XMAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
XJUN 4.3%XMAR 3.3%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
XJUN 1.52XMAR 1.96, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
XJUN −9.1%XMAR −7.3%since Mar 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
XJUN 0.30XMAR 0.23

Popular comparisons

  • XJUNBvsXNOVC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XMARBvsXNOVC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XJUNBvsXSEPC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XMARBvsXSEPC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XJUNBvsXJANC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XMARBvsXJANC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.