Skip to content

GLD vs SGOL

SPDR Gold Shares

GLDBNYSE Arca

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

SGOLBNYSE Arca

Overlap

100.0%by weight

Expense ratio

SGOL −0.23pt a year

GLD 0.40%SGOL 0.17%

Avg volume · 30D

GLD 3.5×the volume

GLD 8.9MSGOL 2.52M

10Y return · a year

SGOL +0.2pt

GLD +12.3%SGOL +12.5%

GLD vs SGOL Performance

Oct 13, 2025 – Oct 13, 2026

+0.9%GLD+1.1%SGOL

Oct 13, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026. GLD +0.9%. SGOL +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GLD 0.40%
SGOL 0.17%, better
Fund size
GLD $141B
SGOL $7.18B
1Y total return
GLD +0.9%
SGOL +1.1%, better
Holdings
GLD 1
SGOL 1
Avg volume (30D)
GLD 8.9M sh, better
SGOL 2.52M sh
NAV per share
GLD $382.42
SGOL $39.84
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GLD: Cost 12, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 78, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. SGOL: Cost 59, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 43, Holdings not scored, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for GLD, SGOL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGLDSGOL
Cost30% weightF12B59Higher
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC49C49
Tradability15% weightA78HigherC43
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA82HigherB62

Rank among Physical Gold funds

Same Category. GLD and SGOL are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Gold⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

SGOL ranks 4th and GLD 9th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.

  1. Rank 1AGLDMSPDR Gold MiniShares TrustScore 81
  2. Rank 2AIAUMiShares Gold Trust MicroScore 77
  3. Rank 3BFGDLFranklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETFScore 67
  4. Rank 4BSGOLabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 5BAAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETFScore 65
  6. Rank 7BOUNZVanEck Merk Gold ETFScore 58
  7. Rank 9BGLDSPDR Gold SharesScore 57
  8. Rank 10CYSAUY all Street Physical Gold ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GLDBSPDR Gold Shares

SGOLBabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

In short

GLD Gold in a brokerage account, running since 2004: a trust that holds physical bullion and trades like a stock. It's the heavyweight of the gold shelf, and the fee is the price of that depth.

SGOL A 2009-vintage trust that owns actual gold bars and does exactly one job: track bullion's price after a 0.17% fee. Middle of the pack on cost, front of the pack on doing what the prospectus says.

Stated mandate

GLD GLD seeks to have its shares track the price of gold bullion after the Trust’s operating expenses.

SGOL The Trust seeks to track the price of physical gold bullion, after deducting its expenses.

Why people hold it

  • GLD Does the one job it advertises: shares track the price of gold bullion after the trust's expenses, and the tracking is among the tightest in the gold group.
  • Huge and very actively traded, which is why spreads tend to be thin and large orders usually find the other side quickly.
  • Plain structure: a grantor trust holding physical gold. No futures, no roll schedule, no leverage between you and the metal.
  • Trading since 2004, one of the longest-running gold vehicles on the US market and through several gold cycles.
  • SGOL Plain plumbing: a grantor trust holding physical bullion, with one job written into its own documents, to track the price of gold after deducting expenses.
  • Tracks the metal about as closely as the wrapper allows, one of the cleanest mandate implementations among physical gold funds.
  • Trading since 2009, through several full gold cycles, and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that changes hands actively.

Worth knowing

  • GLD 0.40% a year is the toll for that liquidity: more than double the typical physical-gold ETF fee, and above its own cheaper sibling GLDM at 0.10%.
  • No dividends or interest. Bullion pays nothing, so the gold price minus the trust's expenses is the entire story.
  • Gold moves in big swings, with no earnings or yield underneath to soften them.
  • SGOL Cost sits at the category median: 0.17% a year, while IAUM (0.09%) and GLDM (0.10%) charge less to hold the same metal.
  • Bullion throws off no income. This is a price-of-gold holding, not a cash-flow one, and the fee comes out of trust assets.
  • One metal, no diversification. The shares go where gold goes, including the long flat stretches and sharp drawdowns.

Full GLD profile⁠

Full SGOL profile⁠

GLD vs SGOL Holdings

Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026

Overlap

100.0%by weight

Only GLD
0
of 1
In both
1
holdings
Only SGOL
0
of 1

Holdings side by side

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingGLDSGOL
Physical GoldPhysical Gold100.00%100.00%

All GLD holdings⁠All SGOL holdings⁠

GLD vs SGOL Cost

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%GLD
  • 0.17%SGOL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Physical Gold funds
  • Median 0.17%

3 of 10 Physical Gold funds charge less than SGOL

9 of 10 charge less than GLD

$4,544less in fees with SGOL over 30 years, on $10,000 invested

$0$2,000$4,000$6,000$8,000$10,000Start10 years20 years30 years

Assumes $10,000 invested once and 7% growth a year before fees.

GLD vs SGOL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 13, 2026
Payout (12M)
GLD: None
SGOL: None

Distribution history

GLDAll GLD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SGOLAll SGOL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GLD vs SGOL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GLD
  • SGOL
Oct 13, 2021 to Oct 13, 2026. Worst fall: GLD −26.4% · Jul 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GLD 19.0%SGOL 18.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GLD 1.28SGOL 1.29, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GLD −26.4%SGOL −26.3%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 3 years
GLD 0.44SGOL 0.40

GLD and SGOL in the news

Popular comparisons