Skip to content

GLDM vs SGOL

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

GLDMANYSE Arca

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

SGOLBNYSE Arca

Overlap

100.0%by weight

Expense ratio

GLDM −0.07pt a year

GLDM 0.10%SGOL 0.17%

Avg volume · 30D

GLDM 1.8×the volume

GLDM 4.52MSGOL 2.52M

5Y return · a year

GLDM +0.1pt

GLDM +18.3%SGOL +18.2%

GLDM vs SGOL Performance

Oct 13, 2025 – Oct 13, 2026

+1.2%GLDM+1.1%SGOL

Oct 13, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026. GLDM +1.2%. SGOL +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GLDM 0.10%, better
SGOL 0.17%
Fund size
GLDM $31B
SGOL $7.18B
1Y total return
GLDM +1.2%, better
SGOL +1.1%
Holdings
GLDM 1
SGOL 1
Avg volume (30D)
GLDM 4.52M sh, better
SGOL 2.52M sh
NAV per share
GLDM $82.52
SGOL $39.84
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GLDM: Cost 91, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 71, Holdings not scored, Durability 67. SGOL: Cost 59, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 43, Holdings not scored, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for GLDM, SGOL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGLDMSGOL
Cost30% weightA91HigherB59
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC49C49
Tradability15% weightA71HigherC43
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB67HigherB62

Rank among Physical Gold funds

Same Category. GLDM and SGOL are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Gold⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

GLDM ranks 1st and SGOL 4th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.

  1. Rank 1AGLDMSPDR Gold MiniShares TrustScore 81
  2. Rank 2AIAUMiShares Gold Trust MicroScore 77
  3. Rank 3BFGDLFranklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETFScore 67
  4. Rank 4BSGOLabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 5BAAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETFScore 65

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GLDMASPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

SGOLBabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

In short

GLDM The house that built the original gold ETF later built a cheaper one. GLDM holds physical gold bullion, charges 0.10% a year (a quarter of its older sibling's fee), and has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund.

SGOL A 2009-vintage trust that owns actual gold bars and does exactly one job: track bullion's price after a 0.17% fee. Middle of the pack on cost, front of the pack on doing what the prospectus says.

Stated mandate

GLDM GLDM seeks to reflect the performance of gold bullion, less the fund's expenses.

SGOL The Trust seeks to track the price of physical gold bullion, after deducting its expenses.

Why people hold it

  • GLDM Ten basis points a year for bullion exposure, below the typical fee among physical gold funds and a quarter of the 0.40% on GLD, the sponsor's original gold trust.
  • Simple plumbing: a grantor trust that holds metal and seeks to reflect gold bullion less expenses. No futures roll, no swap counterparty, no miner-stock beta in the way.
  • One of the strongest implementations in its peer group, and among the more actively traded gold funds, which tends to keep the spread you pay getting in and out modest.
  • Launched in 2018 as the low-fee sibling to the 2004 original, it is now a large, established trust rather than a niche launch hoping to find an audience.
  • SGOL Plain plumbing: a grantor trust holding physical bullion, with one job written into its own documents, to track the price of gold after deducting expenses.
  • Tracks the metal about as closely as the wrapper allows, one of the cleanest mandate implementations among physical gold funds.
  • Trading since 2009, through several full gold cycles, and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that changes hands actively.

Worth knowing

  • GLDM Gold pays nothing. No dividends, no interest, and the trust covers its expenses out of the metal, so gold per share drifts down over time.
  • One metal, one price. This is undiversified exposure to bullion, and gold can swing hard in both directions.
  • A couple of rivals list lower headline fees (IAUM at 0.09%, FGDL at 0.00%) for similar physical gold exposure.
  • SGOL Cost sits at the category median: 0.17% a year, while IAUM (0.09%) and GLDM (0.10%) charge less to hold the same metal.
  • Bullion throws off no income. This is a price-of-gold holding, not a cash-flow one, and the fee comes out of trust assets.
  • One metal, no diversification. The shares go where gold goes, including the long flat stretches and sharp drawdowns.

Full GLDM profile⁠

Full SGOL profile⁠

GLDM vs SGOL Holdings

Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026

Overlap

100.0%by weight

Only GLDM
0
of 1
In both
1
holdings
Only SGOL
0
of 1

Holdings side by side

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingGLDMSGOL
Physical GoldPhysical Gold100.00%100.00%

All GLDM holdings⁠All SGOL holdings⁠

GLDM vs SGOL Cost

Expense ratio

  • 0.10%GLDM, cheaper
  • 0.17%SGOL
  • Middle half of Physical Gold funds
  • Median 0.17%

1 of 10 Physical Gold funds charges less than GLDM

3 of 10 charge less than SGOL

$1,440less in fees with GLDM over 30 years, on $10,000 invested

$0$1,000$2,000$3,000$4,000Start10 years20 years30 years

Assumes $10,000 invested once and 7% growth a year before fees.

GLDM vs SGOL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 13, 2026
Payout (12M)
GLDM: None
SGOL: None

Distribution history

GLDMAll GLDM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SGOLAll SGOL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GLDM vs SGOL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GLDM
  • SGOL
Oct 13, 2021 to Oct 13, 2026. Worst fall: SGOL −26.3% · Jul 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GLDM 18.9%SGOL 18.9%=
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GLDM 1.29SGOL 1.29=
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GLDM −26.3%SGOL −26.3%=
Market sensitivityBeta, 3 years
GLDM 0.41SGOL 0.40

GLDM and SGOL in the news

Popular comparisons