AAPD ranks 1st and CSCS 27th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs CSCS
AAPD −0.04pt a year
0.96%1.00%
AAPD 713.9×the volume
9.21M12.9K
AAPD vs CSCS Performance
−23.7%−34.4%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- CSCS 1.00%
- AAPD $46M
- CSCS $2M
- AAPD −23.7%, better
- CSCS −34.4%
- AAPD 4.60%, better
- CSCS 3.28%
- AAPD 4
- CSCS 4
- AAPD 9.21M sh, better
- CSCS 12.9K sh
- AAPD $10.02
- CSCS $15.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | CSCS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A89 |
| Mission | A85 | A96Higher |
| Risk | A72Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | C43 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and CSCS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
CSCSC
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
CSCS A straight bet against Cisco, the networking giant: CSCS aims for -100% of CSCO's daily move, no leverage stacked on top, in a category crowded with 2x and 3x shorts.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
CSCS The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Cisco Systems, Inc. common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs CSCS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs CSCS Cost
Overpaying CSCS vs AAPD
$654
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
CSCS 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | CSCS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,763 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,625 | $242 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $18,688 | $654 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.00%CSCS
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
CSCS 8th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs CSCS Dividends
- AAPD 4.60%, better
- CSCS 3.28%
- AAPD $0.45
- CSCS $0.50
- AAPD $0.18
- CSCS $0.11
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- CSCS Sep 22, 2026
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- CSCS Sep 29, 2026
- AAPD Quarterly
- CSCS Quarterly
Distribution history
AAPD vs CSCS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%CSCS 27.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32CSCS −1.34
- Worst fall
- AAPD −64.2%CSCS −51.6%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84CSCS −1.45
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.