TSDD ranks 2nd and CSCS 27th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
CSCS vs TSDD
TSDD −0.02pt a year
1.00%0.98%
TSDD 783.9×the volume
12.9K10.1M
CSCS vs TSDD Performance
−34.4%−27.6%
- CSCS 1.00%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- CSCS $2M
- TSDD $37M
- CSCS −34.4%
- TSDD −27.6%, better
- CSCS 3.28%
- TSDD 9.91%, better
- CSCS 4
- TSDD 1
- CSCS 12.9K sh
- TSDD 10.1M sh, better
- CSCS $15.92
- TSDD $7.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSCS | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A96 | A98Higher |
| Risk | B57Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | D26 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C43 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. CSCS and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSCSC
TSDDA
In short
CSCS A straight bet against Cisco, the networking giant: CSCS aims for -100% of CSCO's daily move, no leverage stacked on top, in a category crowded with 2x and 3x shorts.
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
CSCS The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Cisco Systems, Inc. common shares.
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSCS vs TSDD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSCS vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying CSCS vs TSDD
$326
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSCS 1.00%
$18,688
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSCS | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,729 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,504 | $121 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $18,362 | $326 |
- 1.00%CSCS
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
CSCS 8th cheapest of 43 funds
CSCS vs TSDD Dividends
- CSCS 3.28%
- TSDD 9.91%, better
- CSCS $0.50
- TSDD $0.65
- CSCS $0.11
- TSDD $0.65
- CSCS Sep 22, 2026
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- CSCS Sep 29, 2026
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- CSCS Quarterly
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
CSCS vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSCS 27.1%TSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CSCS −1.34TSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- CSCS −51.6%TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CSCS −1.45TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.