AMZD ranks 4th and CSCS 27th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMZD vs CSCS
CSCS −0.02pt a year
1.02%1.00%
AMZD 951.0×the volume
12.3M12.9K
AMZD vs CSCS Performance
−13.5%−34.4%
- AMZD 1.02%
- CSCS 1.00%, better
- AMZD $16M
- CSCS $2M
- AMZD −13.5%, better
- CSCS −34.4%
- AMZD 2.96%
- CSCS 3.28%, better
- AMZD 3
- CSCS 4
- AMZD 12.3M sh, better
- CSCS 12.9K sh
- AMZD $8.34
- CSCS $15.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZD | CSCS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A98Higher | A96 |
| Risk | B68Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A71Higher | C43 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMZD and CSCS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZDA
CSCSC
In short
AMZD Most single-stock bear funds reach for leverage. AMZD skips it: one dollar down for every dollar Amazon rises, for a single trading day, through swaps you buy like any share. 1.02% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
CSCS A straight bet against Cisco, the networking giant: CSCS aims for -100% of CSCO's daily move, no leverage stacked on top, in a category crowded with 2x and 3x shorts.
Stated mandate
AMZD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results tied to AMZN and is materially different from ordinary exchange-traded funds.
CSCS The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Cisco Systems, Inc. common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZD vs CSCS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZD vs CSCS Cost
Overpaying AMZD vs CSCS
$324
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZD 1.02%
$19,012
CSCS 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZD | CSCS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $1,763 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $6,625 | $121 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $18,688 | $324 |
- 1.02%AMZD
- 1.00%CSCS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
CSCS 8th cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD vs CSCS Dividends
- AMZD 2.96%
- CSCS 3.28%, better
- AMZD $0.24
- CSCS $0.50
- AMZD $0.05
- CSCS $0.11
- AMZD Sep 22, 2026
- CSCS Sep 22, 2026
- AMZD Sep 29, 2026
- CSCS Sep 29, 2026
- AMZD Quarterly
- CSCS Quarterly
Distribution history
AMZD vs CSCS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZD 27.4%CSCS 27.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZD −0.86CSCS −1.34
- Worst fall
- AMZD −74.7%CSCS −51.6%
- Market sensitivity
- AMZD −1.36CSCS −1.45
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.