AAPD ranks 1st and ORCS 11th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs ORCS
AAPD −0.01pt a year
0.96%0.97%
AAPD 155.5×the volume
8.8M56.6K
AAPD vs ORCS Performance
−21.6%+15.5%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- ORCS 0.97%
- AAPD $24M
- ORCS $7M
- AAPD −21.5%
- ORCS
- AAPD 4.51%
- ORCS
- AAPD 4
- ORCS 4
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- ORCS 56.6K sh
- AAPD $9.86
- ORCS $29.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | ORCS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A94 |
| Mission | A85Higher | A74 |
| Risk | A75 | A80Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | D33 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | C48 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and ORCS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
ORCSA
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
ORCS The unleveraged short on Oracle. ORCS aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of ORCL's move each day, reset daily, so bearish exposure arrives as a regular ETF share instead of a margin ticket and a stock borrow.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
ORCS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse of Oracle Corporation common shares. Its objective is reset daily and is designed for short-term use rather than tracking the stock over longer periods.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs ORCS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs ORCS Cost
Overpaying ORCS vs AAPD
$164
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
ORCS 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | ORCS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,712 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,443 | $60 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $18,198 | $164 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 0.97%ORCS
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
ORCS 4th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs ORCS Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%
- ORCS
- AAPD $0.45
- ORCS
- AAPD $0.18
- ORCS $0.22
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- ORCS Sep 22, 2026
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- ORCS Sep 29, 2026
- AAPD Quarterly
- ORCS Quarterly
Distribution history
AAPD vs ORCS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%ORCS
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32ORCS
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%ORCS
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84ORCS −2.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.