TSDD ranks 2nd and ORCS 11th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
ORCS vs TSDD
ORCS −0.01pt a year
0.97%0.98%
TSDD 194.3×the volume
56.6K11M
ORCS vs TSDD Performance
+15.5%−20.2%
- ORCS 0.97%, better
- TSDD 0.98%
- ORCS $7M
- TSDD $31M
- ORCS
- TSDD −24.7%
- ORCS
- TSDD 10.55%
- ORCS 4
- TSDD 1
- ORCS 56.6K sh
- TSDD 11M sh, better
- ORCS $29.11
- TSDD $6.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ORCS | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94 | A94 |
| Mission | A74 | A98Higher |
| Risk | A80Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | D33 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C48 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. ORCS and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ORCSA
TSDDA
In short
ORCS The unleveraged short on Oracle. ORCS aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of ORCL's move each day, reset daily, so bearish exposure arrives as a regular ETF share instead of a margin ticket and a stock borrow.
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
ORCS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse of Oracle Corporation common shares. Its objective is reset daily and is designed for short-term use rather than tracking the stock over longer periods.
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ORCS vs TSDD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ORCS vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying TSDD vs ORCS
$164
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ORCS 0.97%
$18,198
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ORCS | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,729 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $6,504 | $61 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $18,362 | $164 |
- 0.97%ORCS, cheaper
- 0.98%TSDD
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
ORCS 4th cheapest of 43 funds
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
ORCS vs TSDD Dividends
- ORCS
- TSDD 10.55%
- ORCS
- TSDD $0.65
- ORCS $0.22
- TSDD $0.65
- ORCS Sep 22, 2026
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- ORCS Sep 29, 2026
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- ORCS Quarterly
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
ORCS vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ORCS TSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- ORCS TSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- ORCS TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ORCS −2.04TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.