TSLS ranks 3rd and AMZD 5th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMZD vs TSLS
TSLS −0.07pt a year
1.02%0.95%
AMZD 29.8×the volume
12.2M410K
AMZD +18.0pt
−20.5%−38.5%
AMZD vs TSLS Performance
−3.4%+1.0%
- AMZD 1.02%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- AMZD $19M
- TSLS $39M
- AMZD −3.4%
- TSLS +1.0%, better
- AMZD 2.65%
- TSLS 3.11%, better
- AMZD 3
- TSLS 4
- AMZD 12.2M sh, better
- TSLS 410K sh
- AMZD $8.90
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZD | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A87 |
| Risk | A72 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | A72Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMZD and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZDA
TSLSA
In short
AMZD Most single-stock bear funds reach for leverage. AMZD skips it: one dollar down for every dollar Amazon rises, for a single trading day, through swaps you buy like any share. 1.02% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
AMZD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results tied to AMZN and is materially different from ordinary exchange-traded funds.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZD vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZD vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying AMZD vs TSLS
$1,143
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZD 1.02%
$19,012
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZD | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $1,678 | $119 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $6,322 | $424 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $17,869 | $1,143 |
- 1.02%AMZD
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD vs TSLS Dividends
- AMZD 2.65%
- TSLS 3.11%, better
- AMZD $0.24
- TSLS $1.57
- AMZD $0.05
- TSLS $0.40
- AMZD Sep 22, 2026
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- AMZD Sep 29, 2026
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- AMZD Quarterly
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
AMZD vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZD 27.4%, betterTSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZD −0.86TSLS −0.76, better
- Worst fall
- AMZD −74.7%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AMZD −1.26TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.