AAPW ranks 1st and BABW 17th of 17 funds in the Leveraged Single-Stock Income Category.
AAPW vs BABW
79.3%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
1.00%1.00%
AAPW 4.8×the volume
14K2.94K
AAPW vs BABW Performance
+25.7%−48.7%
- AAPW 1.00%
- BABW 1.00%
- AAPW $43M
- BABW $1M
- AAPW +25.7%, better
- BABW −48.7%
- AAPW 27.88%
- BABW
- AAPW 5
- BABW 4
- AAPW 14K sh, better
- BABW 2.94K sh
- AAPW $40.28
- BABW $17.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPW | BABW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | C48 |
| Mission | A88 | |
| Risk | A84Higher | F23 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | F8 |
| Holdings | C45Higher | C41 |
| Durability | B66Higher | F23 |
Rank among Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
Same Category. AAPW and BABW are both graded against the same 17 Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPWB
BABWD
In short
AAPW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily. AAPW resets on the calendar week, targeting 1.2x Apple's weekly total return before fees, and cuts a distribution check every week. Cost: 1.00%, no waiver.
Stated mandate
AAPW AAPW seeks income and growth by making weekly distributions while targeting 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Apple common shares, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPW vs BABW Holdings
How AAPW and BABW differ
79.3%
Shared holdings make up 100% of BABW and 80.7% of AAPW.
Level by level
- Country0.0%
- Holdings79.3%
Sector
No Sector split for AAPW and BABW.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AAPWMore in BABW | AAPW | BABW |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | AAPW +100.0 points | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| China | BABW +100.0 points | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Outside the US: BABW 0% developed, 100% emerging.
Concentration
- AAPW200.7%
- BABW262.9%
- AAPW3
- BABW3
Asset class
- AAPW
- Equity
- BABW
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AAPW1
- In both2
- Only in BABW1
Only in AAPW
1 security, 5.7% of AAPW by weight
- Apple Inc5.68%
Only in BABW
1 security, 20.0% of BABW by weight
- Alibaba Group Holding Ltd20.01%
Weight gaps
All 2 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in AAPWMore in BABW | AAPW | BABW |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States Treasury Bill 12/03/2026 | BABW +63.64 points | 67.62% | 131.26% |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | AAPW +1.40 points | 13.05% | 11.65% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPW vs BABW Cost
Same expense ratio
$18,688
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPW 1.00%
$18,688
BABW 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPW | BABW |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,763 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,625 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $18,688 |
- 1.00%AAPW
- 1.00%BABW
- Middle half of Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
- Median 1.00%
AAPW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
BABW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
AAPW vs BABW Dividends
- AAPW 27.88%
- BABW
- AAPW $11.25
- BABW
- AAPW $0.23
- BABW $0.07
- AAPW Nov 2, 2026
- BABW Nov 2, 2026
- AAPW Pays Nov 3, 2026
- BABW Pays Nov 3, 2026
- AAPW Weekly
- BABW Weekly
Distribution history
AAPW vs BABW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPW 27.1%BABW 56.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPW 0.76BABW −1.04
- Worst fall
- AAPW −36.3%BABW −54.8%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPW 1.02BABW 1.18
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.