AAPW ranks 1st and MSTW 15th of 17 funds in the Leveraged Single-Stock Income Category.
AAPW vs MSTW
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
1.00%1.00%
MSTW 74.5×the volume
14K1.04M
AAPW vs MSTW Performance
+25.7%−64.2%
- AAPW 1.00%
- MSTW 1.00%
- AAPW $43M
- MSTW $67M
- AAPW +25.7%, better
- MSTW −64.2%
- AAPW 27.88%
- MSTW 160.83%, better
- AAPW 5
- MSTW 2
- AAPW 14K sh
- MSTW 1.04M sh, better
- AAPW $40.28
- MSTW $3.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPW | MSTW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | C48 |
| Mission | A88Higher | D38 |
| Risk | A84Higher | F9 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | C45 | B65Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A72Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
Same Category. AAPW and MSTW are both graded against the same 17 Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPWB
MSTWC
In short
AAPW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily. AAPW resets on the calendar week, targeting 1.2x Apple's weekly total return before fees, and cuts a distribution check every week. Cost: 1.00%, no waiver.
MSTW MSTR with the leverage dial at 1.2x and a payout stapled on. WeeklyPay resets exposure once a calendar week, not daily, and cuts a distribution every week sized off MSTR's own volatility. The most combustible reference stock in Roundhill's weekly lineup.
Stated mandate
AAPW AAPW seeks income and growth by making weekly distributions while targeting 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Apple common shares, before fees and expenses.
MSTW The Fund seeks weekly distributions and calendar-week returns, before expenses, equal to 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of MSTR.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPW vs MSTW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPW vs MSTW Cost
Same expense ratio
$18,688
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPW 1.00%
$18,688
MSTW 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPW | MSTW |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,763 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,625 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $18,688 |
- 1.00%AAPW
- 1.00%MSTW
- Middle half of Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
- Median 1.00%
AAPW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
MSTW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
AAPW vs MSTW Dividends
- AAPW 27.88%
- MSTW 160.83%, better
- AAPW $11.25
- MSTW $6.01
- AAPW $0.23
- MSTW $0.07
- AAPW Nov 2, 2026
- MSTW Nov 2, 2026
- AAPW Pays Nov 3, 2026
- MSTW Pays Nov 3, 2026
- AAPW Weekly
- MSTW Weekly
Distribution history
AAPW vs MSTW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPW 27.1%MSTW 92.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPW 0.76MSTW −0.84
- Worst fall
- AAPW −36.3%MSTW −87.3%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPW 1.02MSTW 3.36
AAPW and MSTW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
