AAPW ranks 1st and UNHW 7th of 17 funds in the Leveraged Single-Stock Income Category.
AAPW vs UNHW
UNHW −0.01pt a year
1.00%0.99%
AAPW 2.3×the volume
14.7K6.44K
AAPW vs UNHW Performance
+30.9%+21.6%
- AAPW 1.00%
- UNHW 0.99%, better
- AAPW $44M
- UNHW $5M
- AAPW +32.5%
- UNHW
- AAPW 26.76%
- UNHW
- AAPW 5
- UNHW 4
- AAPW 14.7K sh, better
- UNHW 6.44K sh
- AAPW $40.84
- UNHW $44.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPW | UNHW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | C48 |
| Mission | A93Higher | A89 |
| Risk | A84Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | C46 | C46 |
| Durability | B66Higher | D26 |
Rank among Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
Same Category. AAPW and UNHW are both graded against the same 17 Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPWB
UNHWB
In short
AAPW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily. AAPW resets on the calendar week, targeting 1.2x Apple's weekly total return before fees, and cuts a distribution check every week. Cost: 1.00%, no waiver.
UNHW Most single-stock leverage funds reset daily. UNHW works on the calendar week, aiming for 1.2 times UnitedHealth's weekly total return before fees, with weekly payouts written into the mandate.
Stated mandate
AAPW AAPW seeks income and growth by making weekly distributions while targeting 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Apple common shares, before fees and expenses.
UNHW UNHW seeks weekly distributions and calendar-week returns, before fees and expenses, equal to 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of UnitedHealth Group common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPW vs UNHW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPW vs UNHW Cost
Overpaying AAPW vs UNHW
$163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPW 1.00%
$18,688
UNHW 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPW | UNHW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,746 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,565 | $60 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $18,525 | $163 |
- 1.00%AAPW
- 0.99%UNHW, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
- Median 1.00%
UNHW 3rd cheapest of 17 funds
AAPW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
AAPW vs UNHW Dividends
- AAPW 26.76%
- UNHW
- AAPW $11.19
- UNHW
- AAPW $0.20
- UNHW $0.23
- AAPW Nov 9, 2026
- UNHW Nov 9, 2026
- AAPW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- UNHW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- AAPW Weekly
- UNHW Weekly
Distribution history
AAPW vs UNHW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPW 27.1%UNHW
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPW 0.76UNHW
- Worst fall
- AAPW −36.3%UNHW
- Market sensitivity
- AAPW 0.98UNHW 2.60
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.