FLAX ranks 3rd and AAXJ 6th of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.
AAXJ vs FLAX
FLAX −0.53pt a year
0.72%0.19%
AAXJ 51.2×the volume
503K9.82K
FLAX +0.8pt
+6.3%+7.1%
AAXJ vs FLAX Performance
+36.0%+41.2%
- AAXJ 0.72%
- FLAX 0.19%, better
- AAXJ $3.61B
- FLAX $67M
- AAXJ +13.6%
- FLAX +13.9%, better
- AAXJ 1.46%
- FLAX 2.20%, better
- AAXJ 960
- FLAX 1648
- AAXJ 503K sh, better
- FLAX 9.82K sh
- AAXJ $106.05
- FLAX $33.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAXJ | FLAX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | B57Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | D34 | D35Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | C48 | B59Higher |
| Durability | B67Higher | D32 |
Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds
Same Category. AAXJ and FLAX are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAXJC
FLAXB
In short
AAXJ The regional Asia trade with Japan carved out: roughly 900 large- and mid-cap stocks from developed and emerging markets, in one ticker since 2008. You pay up for that precision.
FLAX One line item for Asia's markets with Japan left out: roughly 1,600 stocks at 0.19% a year, less than half the median fee among index-tracking peers. Broad, cheap, and thin to trade.
Stated mandate
AAXJ The fund tracks an index of large- and mid-cap equities from developed and emerging Asian countries, excluding Japan, providing regional international equity exposure.
FLAX The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAXJ vs FLAX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAXJ vs FLAX Cost
Overpaying AAXJ vs FLAX
$10,005
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAXJ 0.72%
$13,957
FLAX 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAXJ | FLAX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,284 | $347 | $937 |
| 20 | $4,888 | $1,351 | $3,537 |
| 30 | $13,957 | $3,952 | $10,005 |
- 0.72%AAXJ
- 0.19%FLAX, cheaper
- Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
- Median 0.19%
FLAX 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
AAXJ 7th cheapest of 7 funds
AAXJ vs FLAX Dividends
- AAXJ 1.46%
- FLAX 2.20%, better
- AAXJ $1.55
- FLAX $0.74
- AAXJ $0.42
- FLAX $0.20
- AAXJ Jun 15, 2026
- FLAX Jun 26, 2026
- AAXJ Jun 18, 2026
- FLAX Jul 6, 2026
- AAXJ Twice a year
- FLAX Twice a year
Distribution history
AAXJ vs FLAX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AAXJ
- FLAX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAXJ 17.2%FLAX 16.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AAXJ 1.01FLAX 1.03, better
- Worst fall
- AAXJ −35.8%FLAX −34.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AAXJ 1.02FLAX 1.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.72% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.