VPL ranks 1st and AAXJ 6th of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.
AAXJ vs VPL
VPL −0.65pt a year
0.72%0.07%
AAXJ 1.3×the volume
503K382K
VPL +1.1pt
+8.0%+9.1%
AAXJ vs VPL Performance
+35.8%+56.3%
- AAXJ 0.72%
- VPL 0.07%, better
- AAXJ $3.61B
- VPL $13.5B
- AAXJ +13.8%
- VPL +21.9%, better
- AAXJ 1.46%
- VPL 2.23%, better
- AAXJ 960
- VPL 2348
- AAXJ 503K sh, better
- VPL 382K sh
- AAXJ $106.05
- VPL $108.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAXJ | VPL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | D34 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | C48 | A74Higher |
| Durability | B67 | A86Higher |
Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds
Same Category. AAXJ and VPL are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAXJC
VPLA
In short
AAXJ The regional Asia trade with Japan carved out: roughly 900 large- and mid-cap stocks from developed and emerging markets, in one ticker since 2008. You pay up for that precision.
VPL Vanguard's scalpel for the developed Pacific: Japan, Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand, down to small caps, for 0.07% a year. Asia-Pacific without Europe bolted on, running since 2005.
Stated mandate
AAXJ The fund tracks an index of large- and mid-cap equities from developed and emerging Asian countries, excluding Japan, providing regional international equity exposure.
VPL VPL seeks to track the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index, targeting Pacific-region common stocks through passive full replication.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAXJ vs VPL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAXJ vs VPL Cost
Overpaying AAXJ vs VPL
$12,477
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAXJ 0.72%
$13,957
VPL 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAXJ | VPL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,284 | $128 | $1,156 |
| 20 | $4,888 | $503 | $4,385 |
| 30 | $13,957 | $1,480 | $12,477 |
- 0.72%AAXJ
- 0.07%VPL, cheaper
- Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
- Median 0.19%
VPL cheapest of 7 funds
AAXJ 7th cheapest of 7 funds
AAXJ vs VPL Dividends
- AAXJ 1.46%
- VPL 2.23%, better
- AAXJ $1.55
- VPL $2.42
- AAXJ $0.42
- VPL $2.42
- AAXJ Jun 15, 2026
- VPL Dec 19, 2025
- AAXJ Jun 18, 2026
- VPL Dec 23, 2025
- AAXJ Twice a year
- VPL Quarterly
Distribution history
AAXJ vs VPL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AAXJ
- VPL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAXJ 17.2%VPL 16.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AAXJ 1.01VPL 1.06, better
- Worst fall
- AAXJ −35.8%VPL −28.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AAXJ 1.02VPL 1.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.72% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.