Skip to content

AAXJ vs IPAC

iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF

AAXJCNasdaq

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF

IPACANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

IPAC −0.63pt a year

AAXJ0.72%IPAC0.09%

Avg volume · 30D

AAXJ 5.1×the volume

AAXJ503KIPAC98.1K

10Y return · a year

IPAC +0.4pt

AAXJ+8.1%IPAC+8.5%

AAXJ vs IPAC Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+36.0%AAXJ+46.5%IPAC

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. AAXJ +36.0%. IPAC +46.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%60%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AAXJ 0.72%
IPAC 0.09%, better
Fund size
AAXJ $3.61B
IPAC $2.67B
1Y total return
AAXJ +13.6%
IPAC +15.3%, better
Yield (12M)
AAXJ 1.46%
IPAC 3.87%, better
Holdings
AAXJ 960
IPAC 1344
Avg volume (30D)
AAXJ 503K sh, better
IPAC 98.1K sh
NAV per share
AAXJ $106.05
IPAC $82.57
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AAXJ: Cost 10, Risk 34, Mission 100, Tradability 74, Holdings 48, Durability 67. IPAC: Cost 77, Risk 63, Mission 81, Tradability 47, Holdings 80, Durability 51.
Pillar letters and Scores for AAXJ, IPAC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAAXJIPAC
Cost30% weightF10A77Higher
Mission25% weightA100HigherA81
Risk15% weightD34B63Higher
Tradability15% weightA74HigherC47
Holdings10% weightC48A80Higher
Durability5% weightB67HigherC51

Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AAXJ and IPAC are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Asia-Pacific Region⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

IPAC ranks 2nd and AAXJ 6th of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.

  1. Rank 1AVPLVanguard FTSE Pacific ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2AIPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BFLAXFranklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 5CEPPiShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETFScore 54
  5. Rank 6CAAXJiShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETFScore 52
  6. Rank 7CAIAiShares Asia 50 ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AAXJCiShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF

IPACAiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF

In short

AAXJ The regional Asia trade with Japan carved out: roughly 900 large- and mid-cap stocks from developed and emerging markets, in one ticker since 2008. You pay up for that precision.

IPAC The developed Pacific in one line item: roughly 1,400 large, mid and small caps for 0.09% a year, well under the 0.35% median for its international peer group. iShares has run it as a core building block since 2014.

Stated mandate

AAXJ The fund tracks an index of large- and mid-cap equities from developed and emerging Asian countries, excluding Japan, providing regional international equity exposure.

IPAC The fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from the Pacific region.

Why people hold it

  • AAXJ One ticket, roughly 900 large- and mid-cap Asian stocks, spanning both developed and emerging markets under a single index rulebook.
  • Running since 2008 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so getting in and out is rarely the hard part.
  • Japan sits outside the MSCI AC Asia ex Japan index by design, leaving investors free to size Japan exposure on their own terms.
  • IPAC Charges 0.09% a year against a 0.35% median for its international cohort. Among its closest-graded peers, only VXUS (0.05%) costs less.
  • Follows the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index closely, among the tightest index-tracking in its peer group.ishares.com
  • "Investable Market" means small caps ride along with the blue chips: roughly 1,400 holdings rather than a short list of household names.
  • Sits in the top quartile of the broad international funds we grade, with no structural flags on the wrapper and a multi-billion-dollar asset base.

Worth knowing

  • AAXJ At 0.72% a year, the fee runs well above the 0.28% typical of its peer group and far above broad international index funds like IXUS at 0.07%.
  • Emerging Asian markets are baked into the mandate, so currency moves and local market swings ride along with the developed-market names.
  • Cash comes back once or twice a year rather than monthly.
  • IPAC One region, not the world. Broader options like VXUS hold developed and emerging markets across the globe in a single ticker.
  • A Pacific-only mandate rides on a handful of economies and their currencies, a narrower base than a globally spread stock fund.
  • Volume is moderate rather than heavy, so spreads can run wider than the largest international funds, and income arrives once or twice a year.

Full AAXJ profile⁠

Full IPAC profile⁠

AAXJ vs IPAC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AAXJ vs IPAC Cost

Overpaying AAXJ vs IPAC

$12,059

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AAXJ 0.72%

    $13,957

  • IPAC 0.09%

    $1,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AAXJ 0.72%
  • IPAC 0.09%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530AAXJ $13,957IPAC $1,898

Year by year

YearAAXJIPACOverpaying
10$1,284$165$1,119
20$4,888$646$4,242
30$13,957$1,898$12,059

Expense ratio

  • 0.72%AAXJ
  • 0.09%IPAC, cheaper
  • Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
  • Median 0.19%

IPAC 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

AAXJ 7th cheapest of 7 funds

AAXJ vs IPAC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
AAXJ 1.46%
IPAC 3.87%, better
Payout (12M)
AAXJ $1.55
IPAC $3.20
Last payment
AAXJ $0.42
IPAC $0.88
Ex-dividend
AAXJ Jun 15, 2026
IPAC Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
AAXJ Jun 18, 2026
IPAC Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
AAXJ Twice a year
IPAC Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AAXJTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll AAXJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.29; Dec 19, 2017 $1.23; Jun 19, 2018 $0.41; Dec 18, 2018 $0.93; Jun 17, 2019 $0.41; Dec 16, 2019 $0.93; Jun 15, 2020 $0.26; Dec 14, 2020 $0.68; Jun 10, 2021 $0.28; Dec 13, 2021 $1.55; Jun 9, 2022 $0.34; Dec 13, 2022 $0.79; Jun 7, 2023 $0.40; Dec 20, 2023 $1.11; Jun 11, 2024 $0.27; Dec 17, 2024 $1.07; Jun 16, 2025 $0.56; Dec 16, 2025 $1.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
IPACTwice a year · 20 paymentsAll IPAC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.64; Dec 19, 2017 $1.14; Jun 19, 2018 $0.72; Dec 18, 2018 $0.78; Jun 17, 2019 $0.82; Dec 16, 2019 $1.15; Jun 15, 2020 $0.58; Dec 14, 2020 $0.50; Jun 10, 2021 $0.81; Dec 13, 2021 $1.56; Dec 30, 2021 $0.21; Jun 9, 2022 $0.95; Dec 13, 2022 $0.53; Jun 7, 2023 $0.78; Dec 20, 2023 $1.11; Jun 11, 2024 $0.80; Dec 17, 2024 $1.29; Jun 16, 2025 $0.85; Dec 16, 2025 $2.32; Jun 15, 2026 $0.88. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

AAXJ vs IPAC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • AAXJ
  • IPAC
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: AAXJ −35.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AAXJ 17.2%IPAC 11.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AAXJ 1.01IPAC 1.18, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AAXJ −35.8%IPAC −27.1%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AAXJ 1.02IPAC 0.86

Popular comparisons

  • AAXJCvsVPLA

    iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF · Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IPACAvsVPLA

    iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF · Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AAXJCvsFLAXB

    iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF · Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IPACAvsFLAXB

    iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF · Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AAXJCvsBBAXB

    iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IPACAvsBBAXB

    iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.