IPAC ranks 2nd and AAXJ 6th of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.
AAXJ vs IPAC
IPAC −0.63pt a year
0.72%0.09%
AAXJ 5.1×the volume
503K98.1K
IPAC +0.4pt
+8.1%+8.5%
AAXJ vs IPAC Performance
+36.0%+46.5%
- AAXJ 0.72%
- IPAC 0.09%, better
- AAXJ $3.61B
- IPAC $2.67B
- AAXJ +13.6%
- IPAC +15.3%, better
- AAXJ 1.46%
- IPAC 3.87%, better
- AAXJ 960
- IPAC 1344
- AAXJ 503K sh, better
- IPAC 98.1K sh
- AAXJ $106.05
- IPAC $82.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAXJ | IPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A77Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A81 |
| Risk | D34 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | C48 | A80Higher |
| Durability | B67Higher | C51 |
Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds
Same Category. AAXJ and IPAC are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAXJC
IPACA
In short
AAXJ The regional Asia trade with Japan carved out: roughly 900 large- and mid-cap stocks from developed and emerging markets, in one ticker since 2008. You pay up for that precision.
IPAC The developed Pacific in one line item: roughly 1,400 large, mid and small caps for 0.09% a year, well under the 0.35% median for its international peer group. iShares has run it as a core building block since 2014.
Stated mandate
AAXJ The fund tracks an index of large- and mid-cap equities from developed and emerging Asian countries, excluding Japan, providing regional international equity exposure.
IPAC The fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from the Pacific region.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAXJ vs IPAC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAXJ vs IPAC Cost
Overpaying AAXJ vs IPAC
$12,059
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAXJ 0.72%
$13,957
IPAC 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAXJ | IPAC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,284 | $165 | $1,119 |
| 20 | $4,888 | $646 | $4,242 |
| 30 | $13,957 | $1,898 | $12,059 |
- 0.72%AAXJ
- 0.09%IPAC, cheaper
- Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
- Median 0.19%
IPAC 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
AAXJ 7th cheapest of 7 funds
AAXJ vs IPAC Dividends
- AAXJ 1.46%
- IPAC 3.87%, better
- AAXJ $1.55
- IPAC $3.20
- AAXJ $0.42
- IPAC $0.88
- AAXJ Jun 15, 2026
- IPAC Jun 15, 2026
- AAXJ Jun 18, 2026
- IPAC Jun 18, 2026
- AAXJ Twice a year
- IPAC Twice a year
Distribution history
AAXJ vs IPAC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AAXJ
- IPAC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAXJ 17.2%IPAC 11.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AAXJ 1.01IPAC 1.18, better
- Worst fall
- AAXJ −35.8%IPAC −27.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AAXJ 1.02IPAC 0.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.72% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.