BBAX ranks 4th and AAXJ 6th of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.
AAXJ vs BBAX
BBAX −0.53pt a year
0.72%0.19%
AAXJ 2.3×the volume
503K218K
BBAX +0.4pt
+6.3%+6.7%
AAXJ vs BBAX Performance
+36.0%+38.1%
- AAXJ 0.72%
- BBAX 0.19%, better
- AAXJ $3.61B
- BBAX $6.76B
- AAXJ +13.6%
- BBAX +15.8%, better
- AAXJ 1.46%
- BBAX 3.77%, better
- AAXJ 960
- BBAX 100
- AAXJ 503K sh, better
- BBAX 218K sh
- AAXJ $106.05
- BBAX $62.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAXJ | BBAX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | B57Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | B66 |
| Risk | D34 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | C48Higher | D30 |
| Durability | B67Higher | B57 |
Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds
Same Category. AAXJ and BBAX are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAXJC
BBAXB
In short
AAXJ The regional Asia trade with Japan carved out: roughly 900 large- and mid-cap stocks from developed and emerging markets, in one ticker since 2008. You pay up for that precision.
BBAX Developed Asia Pacific with Japan deliberately cut out: Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand in one ticket. The region's other half, indexed, at a price below the typical international blend fund.
Stated mandate
AAXJ The fund tracks an index of large- and mid-cap equities from developed and emerging Asian countries, excluding Japan, providing regional international equity exposure.
BBAX The fund is designed to provide indexed exposure to developed Asian Pacific equity markets while excluding Japan.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAXJ vs BBAX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAXJ vs BBAX Cost
Overpaying AAXJ vs BBAX
$10,005
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAXJ 0.72%
$13,957
BBAX 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAXJ | BBAX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,284 | $347 | $937 |
| 20 | $4,888 | $1,351 | $3,537 |
| 30 | $13,957 | $3,952 | $10,005 |
- 0.72%AAXJ
- 0.19%BBAX, cheaper
- Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
- Median 0.19%
BBAX 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
AAXJ 7th cheapest of 7 funds
AAXJ vs BBAX Dividends
- AAXJ 1.46%
- BBAX 3.77%, better
- AAXJ $1.55
- BBAX $2.36
- AAXJ $0.42
- BBAX $0.79
- AAXJ Jun 15, 2026
- BBAX Sep 22, 2026
- AAXJ Jun 18, 2026
- BBAX Sep 24, 2026
- AAXJ Twice a year
- BBAX Quarterly
Distribution history
AAXJ vs BBAX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AAXJ
- BBAX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAXJ 17.2%BBAX 13.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AAXJ 1.01, betterBBAX 0.94
- Worst fall
- AAXJ −35.8%BBAX −23.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AAXJ 1.02BBAX 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.72% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.