FITE ranks 1st and TRFK 6th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
FITE vs TRFK
FITE −0.04pt a year
0.45%0.49%
TRFK 23.3×the volume
7.11K166K
TRFK +7.6pt
+34.2%+41.8%
FITE vs TRFK Performance
+24.6%+15.9%
- FITE 0.45%, better
- TRFK 0.49%
- FITE $161M
- TRFK $1.05B
- FITE +24.6%, better
- TRFK +15.9%
- FITE 0.11%, better
- TRFK 0.03%
- FITE 79
- TRFK 99
- FITE 7.11K sh
- TRFK 166K sh, better
- FITE $115.25
- TRFK $84.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FITE | TRFK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | B67 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A71Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A78 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A82Higher | C50 |
| Durability | A82Higher | A72 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. FITE and TRFK are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FITEA
TRFKB
In short
FITE Most "security" funds mean cybersecurity. FITE reads the word wider: cyber plus border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and AR/VR, bundled into one global index basket since 2017.
TRFK Most tech themes chase the apps. TRFK buys the plumbing: roughly 100 globally listed companies tied to moving, transmitting and communicating data, chosen by index rules, for 0.49% a year.
Stated mandate
FITE The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Future Security Index, targeting companies whose products and services support future security through areas such as cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables, and virtual or augmented reality.
TRFK The fund seeks exposure to globally listed stocks and depositary receipts of companies involved in the data and digital revolution.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FITE vs TRFK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FITE vs TRFK Cost
Overpaying TRFK vs FITE
$751
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FITE 0.45%
$9,041
TRFK 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FITE | TRFK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $883 | $71 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $3,394 | $266 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $9,792 | $751 |
- 0.45%FITE, cheaper
- 0.49%TRFK
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
FITE 3rd cheapest of 18 funds
TRFK 6th cheapest of 18 funds
FITE vs TRFK Dividends
- FITE 0.11%, better
- TRFK 0.03%
- FITE $0.12
- TRFK $0.02
- FITE $0.04
- TRFK $0.02
- FITE Sep 21, 2026
- TRFK Sep 3, 2026
- FITE Sep 23, 2026
- TRFK Sep 8, 2026
- FITE Quarterly
- TRFK Twice a year
Distribution history
FITE vs TRFK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FITE 21.9%, betterTRFK 33.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- FITE 1.26, betterTRFK 1.08
- Worst fall
- FITE −27.1%TRFK −29.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FITE 1.32TRFK 1.88
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.