Skip to content

FITE vs WRND

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

FITEANYSE Arca

NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

WRNDBNasdaq

Overlap

3.8%by weight

Expense ratio

WRND −0.27pt a year

FITE0.45%WRND0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

FITE 13.4×the volume

FITE7.11KWRND532

3Y return · a year

FITE +11.6pt

FITE+34.2%WRND+22.6%

FITE vs WRND Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+24.6%FITE+9.3%WRND

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FITE +24.6%. WRND +9.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FITE 0.45%
WRND 0.18%, better
Fund size
FITE $161M
WRND $11M
1Y total return
FITE +24.6%, better
WRND +9.3%
Yield (12M)
FITE 0.11%
WRND 0.97%, better
Holdings
FITE 79
WRND 208
Avg volume (30D)
FITE 7.11K sh, better
WRND 532 sh
NAV per share
FITE $115.25
WRND $40.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FITE: Cost 83, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings 82, Durability 82. WRND: Cost 100, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 15, Holdings 58, Durability 47.
Pillar letters and Scores for FITE, WRND, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFITEWRND
Cost30% weightA83A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA71A76Higher
Tradability15% weightA78HigherF15
Holdings10% weightA82HigherB58
Durability5% weightA82HigherC47

Rank among Global Thematic funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FITE and WRND are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

FITE ranks 1st and WRND 3rd of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BWRNDNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 4BICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETFScore 68

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FITEAState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

WRNDBNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

In short

FITE Most "security" funds mean cybersecurity. FITE reads the word wider: cyber plus border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and AR/VR, bundled into one global index basket since 2017.

WRND Most innovation funds sell you a story. WRND buys receipts: roughly 200 companies worldwide picked on what they actually spend on R&D and whether that spending earns a return, at a fee well under the thematic norm.

Stated mandate

FITE The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Future Security Index, targeting companies whose products and services support future security through areas such as cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables, and virtual or augmented reality.

WRND The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index. Its passive strategy targets innovative companies worldwide based on high research and development spending.

Why people hold it

  • FITE One theme, many fronts: cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and virtual/augmented reality all sit inside the same index.ssga.com
  • A 0.45% fee undercuts the typical global thematic fund, and it comes from State Street's SPDR lineup rather than a one-fund boutique.
  • Live since 2017, so it has traded through a full cycle of thematic hype and hangover instead of arriving on a back-test.
  • Roughly 80 names spread across sectors and countries, so no single defense contractor or chipmaker steers the whole portfolio.ssga.com
  • WRND 0.18% a year against a 0.56% median for its global thematic peers. Innovation exposure without the boutique markup.newyorklifeinvestments.com
  • Selection leans on the income statement: R&D intensity paired with return on invested capital, favoring firms that turn research budgets into results.newyorklifeinvestments.com
  • Roughly 200 names from a global universe, one of three R&D-screened funds New York Life launched in 2022 rather than a one-off experiment.businesswire.com

Worth knowing

  • FITE Thinly traded next to broad index funds, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads at the moment you transact.
  • Small by SPDR standards. Niche thematic funds lean on sustained investor interest to hold their scale.
  • "Security" is drawn by index rules, so wearables and AR headset makers land beside the cyber and border names.
  • WRND Small and lightly traded, so bid/ask spreads tend to run wider than on mainstream global index funds.
  • Weighting by R&D dollars, with a cap on any single position, tilts the book toward the world's largest research spenders.businesswire.cometfstrategy.com
  • Distributions arrive quarterly, but income isn't the mandate; the index screens on research spending, not payouts.

Full FITE profile⁠

Full WRND profile⁠

FITE vs WRND Holdings

How FITE and WRND differ

Overlap by weight

3.8%

Shared holdings make up 16.1% of FITE and 5.4% of WRND.

Level by level

  • Holdings11 in both3.8%
  • Countryby domicile63.1%
  • Sector9 Sectors77.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FITE and WRND, widest gap first
SectorMore in FITEMore in WRND
IndustrialsFITE +17.9 points
Consumer DiscretionaryWRND +9.1 points
CommunicationWRND +7.1 points
Health CareWRND +4.7 points
TechnologyFITE +2.8 points
EnergyFITE +1.8 points
MaterialsWRND +0.7 points
Consumer StaplesWRND +0.7 points
FinancialsWRND +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FITE and WRND, widest gap first
CountryMore in FITEMore in WRND
United StatesFITE +32.0 points
TaiwanWRND +8.0 points
South KoreaWRND +6.6 points
GermanyWRND +6.2 points
NetherlandsWRND +5.1 points
IsraelFITE +4.0 points
United KingdomWRND +3.2 points
ChinaWRND +1.9 points
Other countries (13)WRND +5.1 points

Outside the US: WRND 51% developed, 49% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FITE23.3%
  • WRND47.1%

Securities held

  • FITE78
  • WRND208

Asset class

FITE
Equity
WRND
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FITE67
  • In both11
  • Only in WRND197

Only in FITE

67 securities, 83.8% of FITE by weight

  • RAPID7 Inc2.95%
  • Qualys Inc2.61%
  • Tenable Holdings Inc2.42%

Only in WRND

197 securities, 94.7% of WRND by weight

  • Apple Inc.7.26%
  • NVIDIA Corporation7.15%
  • Alphabet Inc. Class A5.44%

Weight gaps

All 11 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FITE and WRND, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FITEMore in WRND
Zscaler IncZSFITE +2.40 points
Cloudflare Inc Class ANETFITE +1.61 points
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc ACRWDFITE +1.56 points
Broadcom IncAVGOWRND +1.55 points
Datadog Inc Class ADDOGFITE +1.31 points
Palo Alto Networks IncPANWFITE +1.28 points
Heico CorpHEIFITE +1.19 points
Fortinet IncFTNTFITE +1.08 points

All 78 FITE holdings⁠All 209 WRND holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FITE vs WRND Cost

Overpaying FITE vs WRND

$5,292

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FITE 0.45%

    $9,041

  • WRND 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FITE 0.45%
  • WRND 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530FITE $9,041WRND $3,749

Year by year

YearFITEWRNDOverpaying
10$812$328$484
20$3,128$1,281$1,847
30$9,041$3,749$5,292

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%FITE
  • 0.18%WRND, cheaper
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

WRND cheapest of 18 funds

FITE 3rd cheapest of 18 funds

FITE vs WRND Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FITE 0.11%
WRND 0.97%, better
Payout (12M)
FITE $0.12
WRND $0.40
Last payment
FITE $0.04
WRND $0.10
Ex-dividend
FITE Sep 21, 2026
WRND Sep 30, 2026
Paid on
FITE Sep 23, 2026
WRND Oct 2, 2026
Frequency
FITE Quarterly
WRND Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

FITEQuarterly · 33 paymentsAll FITE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 33 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Mar 19, 2018 $0.02; Jun 18, 2018 $0.02; Sep 24, 2018 $0.01; Dec 24, 2018 $0.47; Mar 18, 2019 $0.05; Jun 24, 2019 $0.01; Sep 23, 2019 $0.05; Dec 23, 2019 $0.06; Mar 23, 2020 $0.31; Jun 22, 2020 $0.02; Dec 21, 2020 $0.08; Mar 22, 2021 $0.28; Jun 21, 2021 $0.0094; Sep 20, 2021 $0.13; Dec 20, 2021 $0.07; Mar 21, 2022 $0.0097; Jun 21, 2022 $0.02; Dec 19, 2022 $0.02; Mar 20, 2023 $0.0037; Jun 20, 2023 $0.02; Sep 18, 2023 $0.02; Dec 18, 2023 $0.03; Mar 18, 2024 $0.03; Jun 24, 2024 $0.02; Sep 23, 2024 $0.02; Dec 23, 2024 $0.0071; Mar 24, 2025 $0.05; Jun 23, 2025 $0.04; Sep 22, 2025 $0.06; Dec 22, 2025 $0.04; Mar 23, 2026 $0.03; Jun 22, 2026 $0.01; Sep 21, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
WRNDQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll WRND payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Mar 18, 2022 $0.06; Jun 17, 2022 $0.17; Sep 16, 2022 $0.08; Dec 16, 2022 $0.11; Mar 31, 2023 $0.11; Jun 30, 2023 $0.08; Sep 29, 2023 $0.15; Dec 15, 2023 $0.21; Jun 28, 2024 $0.16; Sep 30, 2024 $0.11; Dec 30, 2024 $0.06; Mar 31, 2025 $0.11; Jun 30, 2025 $0.18; Sep 30, 2025 $0.09; Dec 30, 2025 $0.11; Mar 31, 2026 $0.05; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14; Sep 30, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

FITE vs WRND Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FITE 21.9%WRND 14.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FITE 1.26, betterWRND 1.18
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FITE −27.1%WRND −27.2%since Feb 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FITE 1.32WRND 1.15

Popular comparisons

  • FITEAvsAGNGA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WRNDBvsAGNGA

    NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FITEAvsICOPB

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WRNDBvsICOPB

    NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FITEAvsHAILB

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WRNDBvsHAILB

    NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.