Skip to content
etf.net

AGNG vs GLAM

Global X Aging Population ETF

AGNGANasdaq

Corgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETF

GLAMCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

GLAM −0.15pt a year

AGNG0.50%GLAM0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

AGNG 7.6×the volume

AGNG10.3KGLAM1.37K

AGNG vs GLAM Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

+7.9%AGNG+6.9%GLAM

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. AGNG +7.9%. GLAM +6.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%2.5%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AGNG 0.50%
GLAM 0.35%, better
Fund size
AGNG $98M
GLAM $2M
1Y total return
AGNG +21.2%
GLAM No data
Yield (12M)
AGNG 0.80%
GLAM No data
Holdings
AGNG 86
GLAM 26
Avg volume (30D)
AGNG 10.3K sh, better
GLAM 1.37K sh
NAV per share
AGNG $40.20
GLAM $30.41
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AGNG: Cost 65, Risk 86, Mission not scored, Tradability 61, Holdings 74, Durability 73. GLAM: Cost 94, Risk 91, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 26, Durability 6.
Pillar letters and Scores for AGNG, GLAM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAGNGGLAM
Cost30% weightB65A94Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA86A91Higher
Tradability15% weightB61HigherD39
Holdings10% weightA74HigherD26
Durability5% weightA73HigherF6

Rank among Global Thematic funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AGNG and GLAM are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

AGNG ranks 2nd and GLAM 11th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3BICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETFScore 68
  4. Rank 9CTINYProShares Nanotechnology ETFScore 44
  5. Rank 11CGLAMCorgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 11COPPGWisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities FundScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AGNGAGlobal X Aging Population ETF

GLAMCCorgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETF

In short

AGNG AGNG plays the one trend nobody needs a crystal ball for: people getting older. About 80 developed-market names in medical devices, pharma and senior living, wrapped around an aging-population index, for 0.50% a year.

GLAM No data

Stated mandate

AGNG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.

GLAM No data

Why people hold it

  • AGNG One ticket on the demographics trade: roughly 80 developed-market companies tied to older consumers, tracking the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.globalxetfs.com
  • 0.50% a year, below the median fee in its global thematic peer group. Niche themes usually charge a premium for the privilege.
  • Running since 2016, so the theme has a long live record rather than a backtest and a pitch deck.
  • Portfolio construction and risk profile put it among the stronger builds in its global thematic peer group.

GLAM No data

Worth knowing

  • AGNG Thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than in mega-cap funds and how you place the order matters more.
  • One theme, tilted to healthcare and developed markets, so its path can look nothing like a broad global index.
  • Distributions arrive annually or semiannually, not monthly, and the asset base is modest by ETF standards.

GLAM No data

Full AGNG profile⁠

Full GLAM profile⁠

AGNG vs GLAM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AGNG vs GLAM Cost

Overpaying AGNG vs GLAM

$2,853

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AGNG 0.50%

    $9,979

  • GLAM 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AGNG 0.50%
  • GLAM 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530AGNG $9,979GLAM $7,126

Year by year

YearAGNGGLAMOverpaying
10$900$634$266
20$3,460$2,454$1,006
30$9,979$7,126$2,853

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%AGNG
  • 0.35%GLAM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

GLAM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds

AGNG 7th cheapest of 18 funds

AGNG vs GLAM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
AGNG 0.80%
GLAM No data
Payout (12M)
AGNG $0.33
GLAM None
Last payment
AGNG $0.16
GLAM No data
Ex-dividend
AGNG Jun 29, 2026
GLAM No data
Paid on
AGNG Jul 7, 2026
GLAM No data
Frequency
AGNG Twice a year
GLAM No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AGNGTwice a year · 17 paymentsAll AGNG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 17 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.20; Dec 28, 2018 $0.19; Jun 27, 2019 $0.05; Dec 30, 2019 $0.14; Jun 29, 2020 $0.04; Dec 30, 2020 $0.05; Jun 29, 2021 $0.03; Dec 30, 2021 $0.17; Jun 29, 2022 $0.11; Dec 29, 2022 $0.02; Jun 29, 2023 $0.15; Dec 28, 2023 $0.12; Jun 27, 2024 $0.10; Dec 30, 2024 $0.15; Jun 27, 2025 $0.14; Dec 30, 2025 $0.17; Jun 29, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
GLAMAll GLAM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AGNG vs GLAM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AGNG 13.1%GLAM No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AGNG 0.98GLAM No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AGNG −23.2%GLAM No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AGNG 0.59GLAM −0.77

Popular comparisons

  • AGNGAvsFITEA

    Global X Aging Population ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GLAMCvsFITEA

    Corgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AGNGAvsICOPB

    Global X Aging Population ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GLAMCvsICOPB

    Corgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AGNGAvsWRNDB

    Global X Aging Population ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GLAMCvsWRNDB

    Corgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.