Skip to content
etf.net

FITE vs GLAM

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

FITEANYSE Arca

Corgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETF

GLAMCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

GLAM −0.10pt a year

FITE0.45%GLAM0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

FITE 5.3×the volume

FITE7.3KGLAM1.37K

FITE vs GLAM Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−8.0%FITE+6.9%GLAM

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. FITE −8.0%. GLAM +6.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−5%0%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FITE 0.45%
GLAM 0.35%, better
Fund size
FITE $142M
GLAM $2M
1Y total return
FITE +24.2%
GLAM No data
Yield (12M)
FITE 0.11%
GLAM No data
Holdings
FITE 80
GLAM 26
Avg volume (30D)
FITE 7.3K sh, better
GLAM 1.37K sh
NAV per share
FITE $102.04
GLAM $30.41
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FITE: Cost 82, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 81, Durability 81. GLAM: Cost 94, Risk 91, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 26, Durability 6.
Pillar letters and Scores for FITE, GLAM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFITEGLAM
Cost30% weightA82A94Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA72A91Higher
Tradability15% weightA77HigherD39
Holdings10% weightA81HigherD26
Durability5% weightA81HigherF6

Rank among Global Thematic funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FITE and GLAM are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

FITE ranks 1st and GLAM 11th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 9CTINYProShares Nanotechnology ETFScore 44
  4. Rank 11CGLAMCorgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 11COPPGWisdomTree GeoAlpha Opportunities FundScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FITEAState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

GLAMCCorgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETF

In short

FITE Most "security" funds mean cybersecurity. FITE reads the word wider: cyber plus border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and AR/VR, bundled into one global index basket since 2017.

GLAM No data

Stated mandate

FITE The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Future Security Index, targeting companies whose products and services support future security through areas such as cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables, and virtual or augmented reality.

GLAM No data

Why people hold it

  • FITE One theme, many fronts: cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and virtual/augmented reality all sit inside the same index.ssga.com
  • A 0.45% fee undercuts the typical global thematic fund, and it comes from State Street's SPDR lineup rather than a one-fund boutique.
  • Live since 2017, so it has traded through a full cycle of thematic hype and hangover instead of arriving on a back-test.
  • Roughly 80 names spread across sectors and countries, so no single defense contractor or chipmaker steers the whole portfolio.ssga.com

GLAM No data

Worth knowing

  • FITE Thinly traded next to broad index funds, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads at the moment you transact.
  • Small by SPDR standards. Niche thematic funds lean on sustained investor interest to hold their scale.
  • "Security" is drawn by index rules, so wearables and AR headset makers land beside the cyber and border names.

GLAM No data

Full FITE profile⁠

Full GLAM profile⁠

FITE vs GLAM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FITE vs GLAM Cost

Overpaying FITE vs GLAM

$1,915

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FITE 0.45%

    $9,041

  • GLAM 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FITE 0.45%
  • GLAM 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530FITE $9,041GLAM $7,126

Year by year

YearFITEGLAMOverpaying
10$812$634$178
20$3,128$2,454$674
30$9,041$7,126$1,915

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%FITE
  • 0.35%GLAM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

GLAM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds

FITE 3rd cheapest of 18 funds

FITE vs GLAM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
FITE 0.11%
GLAM No data
Payout (12M)
FITE $0.12
GLAM None
Last payment
FITE $0.04
GLAM No data
Ex-dividend
FITE Sep 21, 2026
GLAM No data
Paid on
FITE Sep 23, 2026
GLAM No data
Frequency
FITE Quarterly
GLAM No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

FITEQuarterly · 33 paymentsAll FITE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 33 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Mar 19, 2018 $0.02; Jun 18, 2018 $0.02; Sep 24, 2018 $0.01; Dec 24, 2018 $0.47; Mar 18, 2019 $0.05; Jun 24, 2019 $0.01; Sep 23, 2019 $0.05; Dec 23, 2019 $0.06; Mar 23, 2020 $0.31; Jun 22, 2020 $0.02; Dec 21, 2020 $0.08; Mar 22, 2021 $0.28; Jun 21, 2021 $0.0094; Sep 20, 2021 $0.13; Dec 20, 2021 $0.07; Mar 21, 2022 $0.0097; Jun 21, 2022 $0.02; Dec 19, 2022 $0.02; Mar 20, 2023 $0.0037; Jun 20, 2023 $0.02; Sep 18, 2023 $0.02; Dec 18, 2023 $0.03; Mar 18, 2024 $0.03; Jun 24, 2024 $0.02; Sep 23, 2024 $0.02; Dec 23, 2024 $0.0071; Mar 24, 2025 $0.05; Jun 23, 2025 $0.04; Sep 22, 2025 $0.06; Dec 22, 2025 $0.04; Mar 23, 2026 $0.03; Jun 22, 2026 $0.01; Sep 21, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
GLAMAll GLAM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FITE vs GLAM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FITE 21.9%GLAM No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FITE 1.27GLAM No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FITE −26.9%GLAM No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FITE 1.32GLAM −0.77

Popular comparisons

  • FITEAvsAGNGA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GLAMCvsAGNGA

    Corgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FITEAvsICOPB

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GLAMCvsICOPB

    Corgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FITEAvsWRNDB

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GLAMCvsWRNDB

    Corgi Beauty, Skincare & Aesthetics ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.