AGNG ranks 2nd and PRNT 13th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
AGNG vs PRNT
AGNG −0.16pt a year
0.50%0.66%
AGNG 1.6×the volume
10.3K6.46K
AGNG +9.9pt
+11.6%+1.7%
AGNG vs PRNT Performance
+41.2%−36.9%
- AGNG 0.50%, better
- PRNT 0.66%
- AGNG $98M
- PRNT $61M
- AGNG +21.2%, better
- PRNT +8.5%
- AGNG 0.80%, better
- PRNT 0.72%
- AGNG 86
- PRNT 44
- AGNG 10.3K sh, better
- PRNT 6.46K sh
- AGNG $40.20
- PRNT $23.67
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGNG | PRNT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A86Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | A74 | |
| Durability | A73Higher | A72 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. AGNG and PRNT are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGNGA
PRNTD
In short
AGNG AGNG plays the one trend nobody needs a crystal ball for: people getting older. About 80 developed-market names in medical devices, pharma and senior living, wrapped around an aging-population index, for 0.50% a year.
PRNT A pure bet on 3D printing: roughly 60 printer makers, software firms and materials suppliers across the US, Taiwan and developed markets, followed by index rather than picked by a manager. Trading since 2016.
Stated mandate
AGNG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.
PRNT The Fund seeks to closely match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Total 3D-Printing Index. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the Index by holding its securities in approximately the same proportions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGNG vs PRNT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGNG vs PRNT Cost
Overpaying PRNT vs AGNG
$2,917
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGNG 0.50%
$9,979
PRNT 0.66%
$12,896
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGNG | PRNT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,180 | $280 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $4,504 | $1,044 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $12,896 | $2,917 |
- 0.50%AGNG, cheaper
- 0.66%PRNT
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
AGNG 7th cheapest of 18 funds
PRNT 12th cheapest of 18 funds
AGNG vs PRNT Dividends
- AGNG 0.80%, better
- PRNT 0.72%
- AGNG $0.33
- PRNT $0.17
- AGNG $0.16
- PRNT $0.17
- AGNG Jun 29, 2026
- PRNT Dec 26, 2025
- AGNG Jul 7, 2026
- PRNT Dec 29, 2025
- AGNG Twice a year
- PRNT Annual
Distribution history
AGNG vs PRNT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AGNG
- PRNT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGNG 13.1%, betterPRNT 22.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AGNG 0.98, betterPRNT 0.37
- Worst fall
- AGNG −23.2%, betterPRNT −56.5%
- Market sensitivity
- AGNG 0.59PRNT 1.70
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.