FITE ranks 1st and PRNT 13th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
FITE vs PRNT
FITE −0.21pt a year
0.45%0.66%
FITE 1.1×the volume
7.3K6.46K
FITE +22.8pt
+14.0%−8.8%
FITE vs PRNT Performance
+92.6%−36.9%
- FITE 0.45%, better
- PRNT 0.66%
- FITE $142M
- PRNT $61M
- FITE +24.2%, better
- PRNT +8.5%
- FITE 0.11%
- PRNT 0.72%, better
- FITE 80
- PRNT 44
- FITE 7.3K sh, better
- PRNT 6.46K sh
- FITE $102.04
- PRNT $23.67
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FITE | PRNT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | A81 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | A72 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. FITE and PRNT are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FITEA
PRNTD
In short
FITE Most "security" funds mean cybersecurity. FITE reads the word wider: cyber plus border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and AR/VR, bundled into one global index basket since 2017.
PRNT A pure bet on 3D printing: roughly 60 printer makers, software firms and materials suppliers across the US, Taiwan and developed markets, followed by index rather than picked by a manager. Trading since 2016.
Stated mandate
FITE The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Future Security Index, targeting companies whose products and services support future security through areas such as cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables, and virtual or augmented reality.
PRNT The Fund seeks to closely match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Total 3D-Printing Index. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the Index by holding its securities in approximately the same proportions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FITE vs PRNT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FITE vs PRNT Cost
Overpaying PRNT vs FITE
$3,855
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FITE 0.45%
$9,041
PRNT 0.66%
$12,896
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FITE | PRNT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,180 | $368 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $4,504 | $1,376 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $12,896 | $3,855 |
- 0.45%FITE, cheaper
- 0.66%PRNT
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
FITE 3rd cheapest of 18 funds
PRNT 12th cheapest of 18 funds
FITE vs PRNT Dividends
- FITE 0.11%
- PRNT 0.72%, better
- FITE $0.12
- PRNT $0.17
- FITE $0.04
- PRNT $0.17
- FITE Sep 21, 2026
- PRNT Dec 26, 2025
- FITE Sep 23, 2026
- PRNT Dec 29, 2025
- FITE Quarterly
- PRNT Annual
Distribution history
FITE vs PRNT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FITE
- PRNT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FITE 21.9%, betterPRNT 22.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FITE 1.27, betterPRNT 0.37
- Worst fall
- FITE −26.9%, betterPRNT −56.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FITE 1.32PRNT 1.70
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.