WRND ranks 3rd and TRFK 6th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
TRFK vs WRND
WRND −0.31pt a year
0.49%0.18%
TRFK 311.8×the volume
166K532
TRFK +19.2pt
+41.8%+22.6%
TRFK vs WRND Performance
+15.9%+9.3%
- TRFK 0.49%
- WRND 0.18%, better
- TRFK $1.05B
- WRND $11M
- TRFK +15.9%, better
- WRND +9.3%
- TRFK 0.03%
- WRND 0.97%, better
- TRFK 99
- WRND 208
- TRFK 166K sh, better
- WRND 532 sh
- TRFK $84.96
- WRND $40.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TRFK | WRND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C46 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | A81Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | C50 | B58Higher |
| Durability | A72Higher | C47 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. TRFK and WRND are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TRFKB
WRNDB
In short
TRFK Most tech themes chase the apps. TRFK buys the plumbing: roughly 100 globally listed companies tied to moving, transmitting and communicating data, chosen by index rules, for 0.49% a year.
WRND Most innovation funds sell you a story. WRND buys receipts: roughly 200 companies worldwide picked on what they actually spend on R&D and whether that spending earns a return, at a fee well under the thematic norm.
Stated mandate
TRFK The fund seeks exposure to globally listed stocks and depositary receipts of companies involved in the data and digital revolution.
WRND The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index. Its passive strategy targets innovative companies worldwide based on high research and development spending.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TRFK vs WRND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TRFK vs WRND Cost
Overpaying TRFK vs WRND
$6,043
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TRFK 0.49%
$9,792
WRND 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TRFK | WRND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $328 | $555 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $1,281 | $2,113 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $3,749 | $6,043 |
- 0.49%TRFK
- 0.18%WRND, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
WRND cheapest of 18 funds
TRFK 6th cheapest of 18 funds
TRFK vs WRND Dividends
- TRFK 0.03%
- WRND 0.97%, better
- TRFK $0.02
- WRND $0.40
- TRFK $0.02
- WRND $0.10
- TRFK Sep 3, 2026
- WRND Sep 30, 2026
- TRFK Sep 8, 2026
- WRND Oct 2, 2026
- TRFK Twice a year
- WRND Quarterly
Distribution history
TRFK vs WRND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TRFK 33.4%WRND 14.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- TRFK 1.08WRND 1.18, better
- Worst fall
- TRFK −29.1%WRND −27.2%
- Market sensitivity
- TRFK 1.88WRND 1.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.