AGQ ranks 28th and WX 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
AGQ vs WX
0.0%by weight
WX −0.75pt a year
0.95%0.20%
AGQ 9203.0×the volume
2.62M285
AGQ vs WX Performance
−31.5%−3.2%
- AGQ 0.95%
- WX 0.20%, better
- AGQ $847M
- WX $1M
- AGQ −44.7%
- WX
- AGQ 1
- WX 1
- AGQ 2.62M sh, better
- WX 285 sh
- AGQ $43.55
- WX $22.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGQ | WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D26 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | B60Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A80Higher | F23 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. AGQ and WX are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGQC
WXC
In short
AGQ Silver with the volume turned up. Since 2008, AGQ has aimed to double silver's daily move using futures and swaps instead of bullion, and ProShares bills it as the only ETF built on 2x the Bloomberg Silver Subindex.
Stated mandate
AGQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Bloomberg Silver Subindex. It obtains this exposure through futures and swaps rather than directly holding silver.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGQ vs WX Holdings
How AGQ and WX differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AGQ and 0.0% of WX.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AGQ and WX.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for AGQ.
Concentration
- AGQ100.0%
- WX198.9%
- AGQ0
- WX0
Asset class
- AGQ
- Commodities
- WX
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AGQ0
- In both0
- Only in WX0
Only in AGQ
0 securities, 0.0% of AGQ by weight
Only in WX
0 securities, 0.0% of WX by weight
Weight gaps
AGQ and WX share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGQ vs WX Cost
Overpaying AGQ vs WX
$13,714
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGQ 0.95%
$17,869
WX 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGQ | WX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $365 | $1,313 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $1,421 | $4,901 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $4,155 | $13,714 |
- 0.95%AGQ
- 0.20%WX, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
WX cheapest of 95 funds
AGQ 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
AGQ vs WX Dividends
- AGQ None
- WX None
Distribution history
AGQ vs WX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGQ 70.3%WX
- Return per unit of risk
- AGQ 0.54WX
- Worst fall
- AGQ −89.1%WX
- Market sensitivity
- AGQ 0.98WX 2.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.