Skip to content

AGQ vs QLD

ProShares Ultra Silver

AGQCNYSE Arca

ProShares Ultra QQQ

QLDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

QLD −0.06pt a year

AGQ0.95%QLD0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

QLD 1.6×the volume

AGQ2.62MQLD4.15M

10Y return · a year

QLD +31.4pt

AGQ+0.5%QLD+31.9%

AGQ vs QLD Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+17.6%AGQ+97.9%QLD

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. AGQ +17.6%. QLD +97.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.400%600%800%1,000%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AGQ 0.95%
QLD 0.89%, better
Fund size
AGQ $847M
QLD $13.3B
1Y total return
AGQ −44.7%
QLD +10.7%, better
Yield (12M)
AGQ No data
QLD 0.15%
Holdings
AGQ 1
QLD 113
Avg volume (30D)
AGQ 2.62M sh
QLD 4.15M sh, better
NAV per share
AGQ $43.55
QLD $82.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AGQ: Cost 51, Risk 26, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings not scored, Durability 80. QLD: Cost 72, Risk 66, Mission 95, Tradability 100, Holdings 72, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for AGQ, QLD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAGQQLD
Cost30% weightC51A72Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightD26B66Higher
Tradability15% weightB60A100Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA72
Durability5% weightA80A81Higher

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AGQ and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

QLD ranks 1st and AGQ 28th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 77
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 27CUCCProShares Ultra Consumer DiscretionaryScore 50
  4. Rank 28CAGQProShares Ultra SilverScore 49
  5. Rank 28CUVXYProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETFScore 49

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AGQCProShares Ultra Silver

QLDAProShares Ultra QQQ

In short

AGQ Silver with the volume turned up. Since 2008, AGQ has aimed to double silver's daily move using futures and swaps instead of bullion, and ProShares bills it as the only ETF built on 2x the Bloomberg Silver Subindex.

QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.

Stated mandate

AGQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Bloomberg Silver Subindex. It obtains this exposure through futures and swaps rather than directly holding silver.

QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.

Why people hold it

  • AGQ ProShares bills it as the only ETF targeting 2x the daily move of the Bloomberg Silver Subindex, a mandate it has run since December 2008.proshares.com
  • Fees run 0.95% a year, below the median for leveraged funds, which is notable for a strategy built on futures and swaps.
  • Actively traded, which matters for a tool designed to be used day by day rather than parked.
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in a crowded leveraged-bull field.
  • QLD Costs 0.89% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (0.96% gross), below the leveraged-bull category median and under Ultra stablemates ROM (0.93%) and DDM (0.95%).
  • Hits its stated daily 2x mark with very little drift, one of the tighter implementations among the roughly 100 leveraged bull funds in its group.
  • A multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund, so entering and exiting rarely means hunting for the other side of the trade.
  • Trading since June 2006, which makes it one of the longest-running leveraged equity funds on the US shelf rather than a recent product-shelf experiment.

Worth knowing

  • AGQ The 2x target resets each day, so multi-day results can drift well away from twice silver's move, and choppy stretches chew value even if silver ends flat.proshares.com
  • It is a commodity pool, not a 1940 Act fund, so shareholders get a Schedule K-1 at tax time instead of a 1099.proshares.com
  • Exposure comes from silver futures and swaps, not metal in a vault, and the fund is not built to pay income.
  • QLD The 2x objective covers one day only. Hold longer and daily resets plus compounding can push results away from twice the index's move over that stretch, in either direction.proshares.com
  • Magnification runs both ways: a down day in the Nasdaq-100 lands on shareholders at roughly double size, same as an up day.
  • Cheap for geared exposure, still well above a plain unleveraged Nasdaq-100 tracker. The waiver is set to lapse September 30, 2027, after which the 0.96% gross rate applies unless renewed.

Full AGQ profile⁠

Full QLD profile⁠

AGQ vs QLD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AGQ vs QLD Cost

Overpaying AGQ vs QLD

$997

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AGQ 0.95%

    $17,869

  • QLD 0.89%

    $16,872

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AGQ 0.95%
  • QLD 0.89%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530AGQ $17,869QLD $16,872

Year by year

YearAGQQLDOverpaying
10$1,678$1,576$102
20$6,322$5,953$369
30$17,869$16,872$997

Expense ratio

  • 0.95%AGQ
  • 0.89%QLD, cheaper
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds

AGQ 32nd cheapest of 95 funds

AGQ vs QLD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AGQ No data
QLD 0.15%
Payout (12M)
AGQ None
QLD $0.12
Last payment
AGQ No data
QLD $0.03
Ex-dividend
AGQ No data
QLD Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
AGQ No data
QLD Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
AGQ No data
QLD Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AGQAll AGQ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QLDQuarterly · 21 paymentsAll QLD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 21 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0012; Jun 21, 2017 $0.00044; Dec 26, 2018 $0.005; Mar 20, 2019 $0.0078; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0052; Dec 24, 2019 $0.0062; Mar 25, 2020 $0.0011; Dec 22, 2022 $0.05; Sep 20, 2023 $0.09; Dec 20, 2023 $0.04; Mar 20, 2024 $0.03; Jun 26, 2024 $0.05; Sep 25, 2024 $0.03; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.01; Jun 25, 2025 $0.06; Sep 24, 2025 $0.02; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.01; Jun 24, 2026 $0.06; Sep 23, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

AGQ vs QLD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • AGQ
  • QLD
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: AGQ −89.1% · Oct 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−100%−75%−50%−25%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AGQ 70.3%QLD 36.7%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AGQ 0.54QLD 1.04, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AGQ −89.1%QLD −63.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AGQ 0.98QLD 2.46

AGQ and QLD in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AGQCvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Silver · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLDAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra QQQ · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AGQCvsROMA

    ProShares Ultra Silver · ProShares Ultra Technology

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLDAvsROMA

    ProShares Ultra QQQ · ProShares Ultra Technology

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AGQCvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Silver · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLDAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra QQQ · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.