QLD ranks 1st and AGQ 28th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
AGQ vs QLD
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.95%0.89%
QLD 1.6×the volume
2.62M4.15M
QLD +31.4pt
+0.5%+31.9%
AGQ vs QLD Performance
+17.6%+97.9%
- AGQ 0.95%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- AGQ $847M
- QLD $13.3B
- AGQ −44.7%
- QLD +10.7%, better
- AGQ
- QLD 0.15%
- AGQ 1
- QLD 113
- AGQ 2.62M sh
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- AGQ $43.55
- QLD $82.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGQ | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | D26 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A80 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. AGQ and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGQC
QLDA
In short
AGQ Silver with the volume turned up. Since 2008, AGQ has aimed to double silver's daily move using futures and swaps instead of bullion, and ProShares bills it as the only ETF built on 2x the Bloomberg Silver Subindex.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
AGQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Bloomberg Silver Subindex. It obtains this exposure through futures and swaps rather than directly holding silver.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGQ vs QLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGQ vs QLD Cost
Overpaying AGQ vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGQ 0.95%
$17,869
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGQ | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,576 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $5,953 | $369 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $16,872 | $997 |
- 0.95%AGQ
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
AGQ 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
AGQ vs QLD Dividends
- AGQ
- QLD 0.15%
- AGQ None
- QLD $0.12
- AGQ
- QLD $0.03
- AGQ
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- AGQ
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- AGQ
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
AGQ vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AGQ
- QLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGQ 70.3%QLD 36.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AGQ 0.54QLD 1.04, better
- Worst fall
- AGQ −89.1%QLD −63.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AGQ 0.98QLD 2.46
AGQ and QLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
