SCYB ranks 1st and AHYB 39th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
AHYB vs SCYB
SCYB −0.42pt a year
0.45%0.03%
SCYB 202.9×the volume
5.44K1.1M
SCYB +0.7pt
+7.7%+8.4%
AHYB vs SCYB Performance
+2.0%+2.0%
- AHYB 0.45%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- AHYB $72M
- SCYB $2.8B
- AHYB +2.0%
- SCYB +2.0%
- AHYB 6.23%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- AHYB 606
- SCYB 1844
- AHYB 5.44K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- AHYB $44.78
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AHYB | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B64Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | D31 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A73 | A99Higher |
| Durability | D32 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. AHYB and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AHYBB
SCYBA
In short
AHYB Most high-yield ETFs just buy the index and hand you the whole junk market. AHYB pays a team to pick instead: an active bond portfolio measured against the BB-B slice, for 0.45% a year.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
AHYB The fund seeks high current income. Under normal conditions, it invests at least 80% of net assets plus investment borrowings in high-yield debt securities and actively allocates across high-yield corporate bonds.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AHYB vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AHYB vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying AHYB vs SCYB
$8,403
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AHYB 0.45%
$9,041
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AHYB | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $55 | $757 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $216 | $2,912 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $638 | $8,403 |
- 0.45%AHYB
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
AHYB 45th cheapest of 84 funds
AHYB vs SCYB Dividends
- AHYB 6.23%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- AHYB $2.80
- SCYB $1.80
- AHYB $0.24
- SCYB $0.16
- AHYB Oct 6, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- AHYB Oct 8, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- AHYB Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
AHYB vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AHYB 4.2%, betterSCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AHYB 0.74SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- AHYB −14.8%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AHYB 0.62SCYB 0.28
AHYB and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
