CHPS ranks 4th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.
AIFR vs CHPS
3.2%by weight
CHPS −0.56pt a year
0.71%0.15%
CHPS 22.0×the volume
1.57K34.5K
AIFR vs CHPS Performance
−30.1%−22.1%
- AIFR 0.71%
- CHPS 0.15%, better
- AIFR $1M
- CHPS $130M
- AIFR
- CHPS +57.9%
- AIFR
- CHPS 0.42%
- AIFR 11
- CHPS 54
- AIFR 1.57K sh
- CHPS 34.5K sh, better
- AIFR $19.61
- CHPS $75.55
ETF.net Grade
- —AIFRNot yet graded
| Pillar | AIFR | CHPS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100 | |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | B56 | |
| Tradability | C50 | |
| Holdings | A88 | |
| Durability | A70 |
Rank among Semiconductors funds
Our read on each fund
AIFR—
CHPSA
In short
CHPS Semiconductors without the semiconductor markup. CHPS tracks a global chip index with an ESG screen baked in, holds roughly 50 names, and charges 0.15%, undercutting the category's household names.
Stated mandate
CHPS The fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AIFR vs CHPS Holdings
How AIFR and CHPS differ
3.2%
Shared holdings make up 15.4% of AIFR and 3.2% of CHPS.
Level by level
- Holdings3.2%
- Country64.2%
Sector
No Sector split for AIFR.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AIFRMore in CHPS | AIFR | CHPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Israel | AIFR +16.9 points | 17.3% | 0.4% |
| Taiwan | CHPS +11.6 points | 0.0% | 11.6% |
| United States | AIFR +10.9 points | 73.4% | 62.5% |
| Japan | CHPS +10.4 points | 0.0% | 10.4% |
| China | AIFR +8.1 points | 9.4% | 1.3% |
| Netherlands | CHPS +5.9 points | 0.0% | 5.9% |
| South Korea | CHPS +5.2 points | 0.0% | 5.2% |
| Germany | CHPS +1.6 points | 0.0% | 1.6% |
| Other countries (2) | CHPS +1.1 points | 0.0% | 1.1% |
Outside the US: AIFR 0% developed, 100% emerging. CHPS 50% developed, 50% emerging.
Concentration
- AIFR111.9%
- CHPS47.4%
- AIFR5
- CHPS53
Asset class
- AIFR
- Equity
- CHPS
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AIFR4
- In both1
- Only in CHPS52
Only in AIFR
4 securities, 30.6% of AIFR by weight
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/203113.38%
- GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc7.61%
- Tower Semiconductor Ltd6.24%
- Hua Hong Grace Semiconductor Ltd3.41%
Only in CHPS
52 securities, 96.7% of CHPS by weight
- NVIDIA Corp5.34%
- Texas Instruments Inc5.31%
- Advanced Micro Dev5.20%
- Micron Technology4.97%
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing4.95%
- ASML Holding NV4.81%
- Broadcom4.46%
- Analog Devices Inc4.44%
- SK Hynix Inc4.09%
- MediaTek Inc3.86%
- Lam Research Corp3.82%
- Kla-Tencor Corp3.81%
- QUALCOMM Inc3.80%
- Marvell Technology Group Ltd3.76%
- Applied Materials Inc3.64%
- Advantest Corp3.50%
- Tokyo Electron Ltd2.98%
- Kioxia Holdings Corp2.16%
- ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd1.69%
- Infineon Technologies AG1.61%
- NXP Semiconductors NV1.44%
- Te Connectivity Ltd1.37%
- Monolithic Power Systems Inc1.26%
- Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co Ltd1.08%
- Teradyne Inc0.94%
- Microchip Technology Inc0.90%
- Coherent Corp0.90%
- United Microelectronics Corp0.87%
- ASM International NV0.83%
- Astera Labs Inc0.76%
- STMicroelectronics NV0.67%
- Renesas Electronics Corp0.65%
- ON Semiconductor Corp0.61%
- Disco Corp0.60%
- Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.55%
- Entegris Inc0.52%
- Arm Holdings PLC Ads0.45%
- Nanya Technology Corp0.44%
- Tower Semiconductor Ltd0.43%
- VAT Group AG0.41%
- Lasertec Corp0.41%
- First Solar Inc0.40%
- MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings0.33%
- MKS Instruments Inc0.28%
- Lattice Semiconductor Corp0.28%
- BE Semiconductor Indstries NV0.27%
- MPI Corporation0.26%
- Fabrinet0.25%
- Screen Holdings Co0.24%
- Taiwan Semiconductor-Sp Adr0.08%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in AIFRMore in CHPS | AIFR | CHPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Corp | AIFR +12.27 points | 15.45% | 3.18% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AIFR vs CHPS Cost
Overpaying AIFR vs CHPS
$10,645
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AIFR 0.71%
$13,782
CHPS 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AIFR | CHPS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,267 | $274 | $993 |
| 20 | $4,824 | $1,071 | $3,753 |
| 30 | $13,782 | $3,137 | $10,645 |
- 0.71%AIFR
- 0.15%CHPS, cheaper
- Middle half of Semiconductors funds
- Median 0.60%
CHPS cheapest of 25 funds
AIFR 20th cheapest of 25 funds
AIFR vs CHPS Dividends
- AIFR
- CHPS 0.42%
- AIFR None
- CHPS $0.31
- AIFR
- CHPS $0.10
- AIFR
- CHPS Sep 18, 2026
- AIFR
- CHPS Sep 25, 2026
- AIFR
- CHPS Quarterly
Distribution history
AIFR vs CHPS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AIFR CHPS 41.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AIFR CHPS 1.12
- Worst fall
- AIFR CHPS −39.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AIFR 0.00CHPS 2.16
AIFR and CHPS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.71% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.71% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.71% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

