SOXQ ranks 1st and CHPS 4th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.
CHPS vs SOXQ
CHPS −0.04pt a year
0.15%0.19%
SOXQ 52.1×the volume
34.5K1.8M
CHPS +2.3pt
+52.3%+50.0%
CHPS vs SOXQ Performance
+61.5%+48.4%
- CHPS 0.15%, better
- SOXQ 0.19%
- CHPS $130M
- SOXQ $2.76B
- CHPS +61.5%, better
- SOXQ +48.4%
- CHPS 0.41%, better
- SOXQ 0.35%
- CHPS 54
- SOXQ 32
- CHPS 34.5K sh
- SOXQ 1.8M sh, better
- CHPS $75.55
- SOXQ $84.13
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CHPS | SOXQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A92 |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | B56 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C49 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | A79 |
| Durability | A70 | A83Higher |
Rank among Semiconductors funds
Same Category. CHPS and SOXQ are both graded against the same 25 Semiconductors funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CHPSA
SOXQA
In short
CHPS Semiconductors without the semiconductor markup. CHPS tracks a global chip index with an ESG screen baked in, holds roughly 50 names, and charges 0.15%, undercutting the category's household names.
SOXQ SOXQ owns the semiconductor industry's landmark benchmark, the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, for 0.19% a year. About 30 US-listed chip names, at roughly half the fee of the typical semiconductor fund.
Stated mandate
CHPS The fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index before fees and expenses.
SOXQ The Fund seeks to track the investment results, before fees and expenses, of the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CHPS vs SOXQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CHPS vs SOXQ Cost
Overpaying SOXQ vs CHPS
$815
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CHPS 0.15%
$3,137
SOXQ 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CHPS | SOXQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $347 | $73 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,351 | $280 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $3,952 | $815 |
- 0.15%CHPS, cheaper
- 0.19%SOXQ
- Middle half of Semiconductors funds
- Median 0.60%
CHPS cheapest of 25 funds
SOXQ 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
CHPS vs SOXQ Dividends
- CHPS 0.41%, better
- SOXQ 0.35%
- CHPS $0.31
- SOXQ $0.29
- CHPS $0.10
- SOXQ $0.08
- CHPS Sep 18, 2026
- SOXQ Sep 21, 2026
- CHPS Sep 25, 2026
- SOXQ Sep 25, 2026
- CHPS Quarterly
- SOXQ Quarterly
Distribution history
CHPS vs SOXQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CHPS 41.2%SOXQ 37.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CHPS 1.12SOXQ 1.15, better
- Worst fall
- CHPS −39.4%SOXQ −46.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CHPS 2.16SOXQ 2.19
CHPS and SOXQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

