Skip to content

AKRE vs JUSA

Akre Focus ETF

AKREDNYSE Arca

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

JUSAANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

JUSA −0.80pt a year

AKRE0.98%JUSA0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

AKRE 4.7×the volume

AKRE462KJUSA98.8K

AKRE vs JUSA Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−9.3%AKRE+10.8%JUSA

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AKRE −9.3%. JUSA +10.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AKRE 0.98%
JUSA 0.18%, better
Fund size
AKRE $4.94B
JUSA $745M
1Y total return
AKRE −9.3%
JUSA +10.8%, better
Yield (12M)
AKRE No data
JUSA 0.72%
Holdings
AKRE 21
JUSA 263
Avg volume (30D)
AKRE 462K sh, better
JUSA 98.8K sh
NAV per share
AKRE $59.16
JUSA $67.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AKRE: Cost 3, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 69, Holdings 16, Durability 87. JUSA: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission 84, Tradability 58, Holdings 84, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for AKRE, JUSA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAKREJUSA
Cost30% weightF3A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA84
Risk15% weightF18A92Higher
Tradability15% weightB69HigherB58
Holdings10% weightF16A84Higher
Durability5% weightA87HigherA76

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AKRE and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

JUSA ranks 1st and AKRE 82nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 81DTSELTouchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETFScore 27
  4. Rank 82DAKREAkre Focus ETFScore 26
  5. Rank 83DAOTGAOT Growth and Innovation ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AKREDAkre Focus ETF

JUSAAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

In short

AKRE The ETF successor to Akre Capital's 2009 focus fund: a deliberately concentrated, non-diversified book of businesses meant to be held for years. Multi-billion-dollar scale, and a mutual-fund-era fee of 0.98%.

JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

AKRE The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.

Why people hold it

  • AKRE The strategy has a paper trail. This is the ETF successor to a mutual fund that began operating in 2009, so the approach long predates the wrapper.akrecapital.com
  • Non-diversified on purpose: a focused portfolio, so each holding actually moves the needle instead of being diluted across hundreds of names.akrecapital.com
  • One job, stated plainly in the filings: long-term capital appreciation, mostly US names with room for international ones.sec.gov
  • Among the easier active funds in its peer group to get in and out of, with a multi-billion-dollar asset base behind it.
  • JUSA 0.18% a year with no waiver propping it up, below its category median. GUSE charges 0.30% and LRGC 0.39% for similar enhanced-index work; FELG ties it at 0.18%.
  • Active where it counts, plain where it doesn't: bottom-up stock picks across roughly 300 large caps, with sector mix and risk profile kept close to the S&P 500.jpmorgan.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in a 90-fund peer group of active large-cap funds, helped by a low fee and tightly managed risk.

Worth knowing

  • AKRE 0.98% is a mutual-fund-era price tag, well above what most active large-cap growth ETFs charge. Rivals like JUSA and FELG cover similar ground for a fraction of it.sec.gov
  • Concentration cuts both ways. In a non-diversified book, a single-name stumble lands harder than it would in a broad index.akrecapital.com
  • Built for capital appreciation, not income. There is no regular distribution schedule to plan around here.
  • JUSA Launched in March 2025, so there is only a short live record on this ticker to judge.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than the giant index funds', especially in fast markets.
  • Tracking the S&P 500's sector weights limits how far results can stray from the benchmark in either direction. This is a nudge on the index, not a different bet.jpmorgan.com

Full AKRE profile⁠

Full JUSA profile⁠

AKRE vs JUSA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AKRE vs JUSA Cost

Overpaying AKRE vs JUSA

$14,613

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AKRE 0.98%

    $18,362

  • JUSA 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AKRE 0.98%
  • JUSA 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530AKRE $18,362JUSA $3,749

Year by year

YearAKREJUSAOverpaying
10$1,729$328$1,401
20$6,504$1,281$5,223
30$18,362$3,749$14,613

Expense ratio

  • 0.98%AKRE
  • 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JUSA cheapest of 90 funds

AKRE 87th cheapest of 90 funds

AKRE vs JUSA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AKRE No data
JUSA 0.72%
Payout (12M)
AKRE None
JUSA $0.49
Last payment
AKRE No data
JUSA $0.13
Ex-dividend
AKRE No data
JUSA Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
AKRE No data
JUSA Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
AKRE No data
JUSA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

AKREAll AKRE payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUSAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JUSA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.15; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 22, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

AKRE vs JUSA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AKRE 26.4%since Nov 2025JUSA 11.6%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AKRE −0.39since Nov 2025JUSA 1.41since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AKRE −24.2%since Oct 2025JUSA −14.0%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AKRE 0.88JUSA 0.98

AKRE and JUSA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AKREDvsGUSEA

    Akre Focus ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsGUSEA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AKREDvsLRGCA

    Akre Focus ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsLRGCA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AKREDvsFELGA

    Akre Focus ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsFELGA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.